|Own your ow legal marijuana business||
Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry
|Carl Olsen's Marijuana Archive|
A NON PROFIT LEGAL, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION
CONNECTICUT AVENUE NW
T 202-483-8751 F 202-483-0057 E-MAIL NORMLFNDTN@AOL.COM
. . . a weekly service for the media on news items related to marijuana prohibition.
April 9, 1998
Senator Wants To Extend Marijuana Prohibition To
April 9, 1998, Washington, D.C.:
The Senate approved a "sense of the Senate" resolution on April 3 denying
funding for any future medical marijuana research projects. The amendment --
introduced by Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Oregon) -- is included in Senate Concurrent Resolution
86, a measure outlining Congressional budgets for the next five years. Although the
amendment is not legally binding, the resolution may influence Congress when determining
funding levels for health and research programs.
"The language proposed by Smith represents the extreme position of those in Congress who stand against the use of marijuana as a medicine," said NORML Executive Director R. Keith Stroup. "This amendment is a slap in the face to respected scientific and medical institutions such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the American Medical Association (AMA), the National Academy of Sciences, the American Cancer Society, and others -- all of which have recently urged the federal government to facilitate clinical trials to better determine marijuana's therapeutic potential."
Senate Amendment 2180 states that "no funds appropriated by Congress should be used to ... fund or support, or to compel any individual, institution, or government entity to ... support any item, good, benefit, program, or service, for the purpose of marijuana for medicinal purposes." Smith argued that his amendment will help ensure that America's children are not sent mixed messages on drug use.
Federal funds should only be spent on research to discover more effective prescription medications, and not on the "medicinal use of an illegal drug that is highly addictive and dangerous," he added.
Presently, all scientific protocols to examine marijuana's medical potential must receive federal funds. According to Rick Doblin -- head of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) -- this is because the only legal supplier of marijuana for research purposes remains the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and that agency will only consider providing marijuana to projects that have passed the NIH grant review process. Presently, the NIH is funding only one study regarding marijuana's medical potential.
"Senator Smith's amendment suggests that he cares more for anti-medical marijuana rhetoric than he does for people who suffer from the diseases for which marijuana is claimed to be effective in treating," said Doblin, who also serves of NORML's board of directors. "Hopefully, neither he nor any of his loved ones will come to regret this triumph of ideology over medicine."
Senate Con. Res. 86 now goes to the House for consideration.
For more information, please contact either Paul Armentano or Keith Stroup of NORML @ (202) 483-5500.
Use Of Thermal Imaging Without A Warrant Unconstitutional,
Ninth Circuit Rules
April 9, 1998, Portland, OR:
The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday that the Constitution's
Fourth Amendment protects citizens against the warrantless use of thermal imaging scanning
devices to measure heat emissions from residences. The Court rejected contrary case
law from the seventh, eighth, and eleventh circuits on grounds that they improperly
analogized excess heat from residential interiors to heat emanating from trash.
"This decision affirms the right of individuals to be free in their home from unreasonable searches," NORML Executive Director R. Keith Stroup, Esq. said. Stroup noted that the conflicting decisions by the circuit courts may persuade the Supreme Court to rule on the issue.
Thermal scanners detect heat from numerous sources inside the home such as bathing, ovens, indoor gardening, and sexual activity. The technology is often used by law enforcement officials to identify possible indoor marijuana-grow operations.
The details unveiled by a thermal imager are sufficiently intimate to give rise to a Fourth Amendment violation, declared Judge Robert Merhige, writing for the court. "While the imager cannot reproduce images or sounds, it strips the sanctuary of the home of the 'right to be let alone' from arbitrary and discriminatory monitoring by government officials," he said. "The use of a thermal imager to observe heat emitted from various objects within the home infringes on an expectation of privacy that society deems reasonable."
Dissenting Judge Michael Hawkins argued the use of thermal imaging fails to constitute a search "under contemporary Fourth Amendment standards."
Tanya Kangas, Director of Litigation for The NORML Foundation, praised the majority opinion. "Fortunately, two of the three judges in this case looked to common sense and the privacy expectations of typical reasonable persons to be free in their homes."
The case is United States v. Danny Lee Kyllo, No. 96-30333 (9th Cir. filed April 7, 1998).
For more information or to notify the NORML Foundation of additional thermal imaging cases, please contact Tanya Kangas @ (202) 483-8751. For more information on thermal imaging and the law, please contact NORML Legal Committee member John Henry Hingson @ (503) 656-0355.
Hawaii Health Committee Urges Federal Government To Expedite
Medical Marijuana Research
April 9, 1998, Honolulu, HI:
Hawaii's House Committee on Health approved a resolution on Saturday urging the
federal government to expedite research into the medical efficacy of marijuana.
"This measure makes it clear that the medical value of marijuana should be determined by science, not politics," said the bill's sponsor, Rep. David Tarnas (D-South Kohala). "The state is taking this reasonable and measured step specifically because the federal government has a history of refusing to take action [on the medical marijuana issue.]"
Earlier this year, Tarnas introduced legislation exempting patients and their primary caregivers who possessed or cultivated marijuana for medical use from criminal penalties. The Health Committee rejected that bill in February, but Chairman Alex Santiago (D-Pupukea) encouraged Tarnas to draft a separate resolution endorsing research.
"It is ... appropriate to urge the federal government to move more swiftly in its establishment of rigorous scientific protocol standards to reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule II drug," Santiago said. At least five states -- California, Michigan, New Hampshire, and Missouri -- have previously approved resolutions urging the government to allow doctors to prescribe marijuana.
NORML Executive Director R. Keith Stroup, Esq. said he supported state resolutions aimed at reforming federal law, but emphasized that state laws are also necessary to protect patients already using medical marijuana from state criminal charges. "States must realize that they can play a pivotal role in protecting the health and safety of bona fide medical marijuana patients," he said.
For more information, please contact either Rep. David Tarnas @ (808) 586-8510 or Keith Stroup of NORML @ (202) 483-5500.
MORE THAN 11 MILLION MARIJUANA ARRESTS SINCE 1965 . . . ANOTHER EVERY 49 SECONDS!
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy
Major Studies of Drug and Drug Policy
Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding - The Report of the US National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse
Licit and Illicit Drugs
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
The Drug Hang-Up
Congressional Transcripts of the Hearings for the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
Frequently Asked Questions About Drugs
Basic Facts About the Drug War
Charts and Graphs about Drugs
Information on Alcohol
Guide to Heroin - Frequently Asked Questions About Heroin
LSD, Mescaline, and Psychedelics
Drugs and Driving
Children and Drugs
Drug Abuse Treatment Resource List
American Society for Action on Pain
Let Us Pay Taxes
Marijuana Business News
Reefer Madness Collection
Medical Marijuana Throughout History
Drug Legalization Debate
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
DEA Ruling on Medical Marijuana
Legal References on Drugs
GAO Documents on Drugs
Response to the Drug Enforcement Agency
|Drug Information Articles|
Taking a drug test:
How To Pass A Drug Test
Beat Drug Test
Pass Drug Test
Drug Screening Tests
Drug Addiction Treatment