|Own your ow legal marijuana business||
Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry
|Major Studies of Drugs and Drug Policy|
|Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs|
|Volume I - General Orientation|
The Committee's mandate is a
continuation of the history of drug legislation passed by the Parliament of
Canada in 1996, the Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act. That legislation, which revised drug statutes in Canada by
repealing the Narcotic Control Act
and certain sections of the Food and
Drugs Act, grew out of a relatively lengthy history of which we will
provide only a brief overview here, since Chapter 12 is devoted to a
detailed history of drug laws in Canada.
Bill C‑7, which was
tabled by the newly elected government in February 1994, proposed a revision of
illegal drug legislation, in particular to make it more coherent and to render national
legislation consistent with Canada's obligations under the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances signed in 1988. Following prorogation, it was
reintroduced in the House of Commons at the start of the 2nd Session, on
March 6, 1996, as Bill C‑8. It was adopted by the House on the
same day and was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and
Constitutional Affairs which conducted a detailed study of it and heard a
number of witnesses.
In its report, the Senate Committee
on Legal and Constitutional Affairs proposed 15 amendments as well as the
striking of a joint parliamentary committee of the House of Commons and the
Senate, which would review Canada's drug policy. Bill C‑8 was passed
and received Royal Assent on June 20, 1996, and is thus Canada’s current
illegal drug legislation.
While this legislation was being
studied by the Sub-Committee on Bill C-7 of the Standing Committee on Health of
the House of Commons in 1994 and 1995, "the vast majority of witnesses (…) were highly critical of the bill.
The most general criticisms concerned three points: first, the lack of basic
principles or an express statement as to the purpose of the act; second, the
fact that the bill followed the prohibition system of the 1920s, subsequently
codified in the Narcotic Control Act, and third, the absence of any emphasis on
damage reduction and prevention criteria which form the basis of Canada's Drug
Strategy." Despite the amendments made by the Sub‑Committee
of the House, the testimony of the persons heard by the Senate Committee was
equally critical. Witnesses noted that the Act did not categorize drugs on the
basis of the dangers they represented, that it did not contain any specific,
rational criteria and that it was impossible, particularly in view of the Act's
complexity, to determine how it would be implemented in practice.
All of these criticisms led the Senate Committee to "propose energetically" the creation of a Joint Committee of the House of Commons and the Senate that would review all Canadian drug legislation, policies and programs.
However, the 1997 federal election rendered this suggestion moot. Senator Nolin, convinced of the need for action and faced with the inaction of the House of Commons, thus tabled his first motion in 1999 - that a Senate Committee be struck and given a mandate to examine the legislation, policies and programs on illegal drugs in Canada. The motion was adopted by the Senate in April 2000. In support of the motion, Senator Nolin had commissioned a study on drugs and drug policy in Canada. The purpose of this study, in particular, was "to assist in analyzing policy on the control of drug use from a new angle, without being influenced by the often unfounded prejudices that Canadian society has of drug addicts". Senator Nolin wrote further that a Senate Special Committee "would be charged, first, with transmitting to the Canadian public accurate and objective information on the use of illegal drugs, their effects on individuals and society and control measures in place. Second, it could conduct consultations on desirable amendments that Parliament should make to legislation on the control of drug use in the years to come."
Allain, J. (1997) Bill C-8:Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act. Ottawa, Library of Parliament, page 35.
Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Eleventh
rapport, June 1996, page 8.
 Nolin, P.C. (1998) Preface. In Riley, D. (1998), Drugs and Drug Policy in Canada. A Brief Review and Commentary. Ottawa, page 10.
 Ibid., page 11.
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy
Major Studies of Drug and Drug Policy
Marihuana, A Signal of Misunderstanding - The Report of the US National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse
Licit and Illicit Drugs
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
The Drug Hang-Up
Congressional Transcripts of the Hearings for the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
Frequently Asked Questions About Drugs
Basic Facts About the Drug War
Charts and Graphs about Drugs
Information on Alcohol
Guide to Heroin - Frequently Asked Questions About Heroin
LSD, Mescaline, and Psychedelics
Drugs and Driving
Children and Drugs
Drug Abuse Treatment Resource List
American Society for Action on Pain
Let Us Pay Taxes
Marijuana Business News
Reefer Madness Collection
Medical Marijuana Throughout History
Drug Legalization Debate
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
DEA Ruling on Medical Marijuana
Legal References on Drugs
GAO Documents on Drugs
Response to the Drug Enforcement Agency
|Drug Information Articles|
Taking a drug test:
How To Pass A Drug Test
Beat Drug Test
Pass Drug Test
Drug Screening Tests
Drug Addiction Treatment