Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry
| Own your ow legal marijuana business | Your guide to making money in the multi-billion dollar marijuana industry |
| Major Studies of Drugs and Drug Policy | ||||
| Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs | ||||
| Volume 3 - Public Policy Options |
|
|
Bibliography
I – Bibliographical References
Abt Associates. 2001.The Price of Illicit Drugs : 1981
through the Second Quarter of2000.Washington (D.C.) : Office of National
Drug Control Policy Adhikari,P.
and A. Summerill. 2000.1998 NationalDrug
Strategy Household Survey: DetailedFindings. Canberra : Australian
Institute of Health and Welfare. (DrugStatistics Series No. 6). (Available
online at:http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/health/ndshs98d/index.html) Adlaf, E.M. and A. Ialomiteanu.
2000.CAMHMonitor Report : Addiction
and Mental Health Indicators among OntarioAdults, 1977-2000.
Toronto :Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Adlaf, E.M. and A. Paglia.
2001.Drug Use among Ontario Students
1977-2001. Findings from the OSDUS. Toronto : Centre for Addiction and
Mental Health. Aebi, M.F., Killias, M. and D.
Ribeau. 1999. « Prescriptionmédicale de stupéfiants et délinquance :
Résultats des essais suisses ».Criminologie32(2) :
127-148. Alexander, B.K. 2000. « Theglobalization of
addiction. » AddictionResearch.
8(6) : 504. Ali,R.
et. al. 1998.The Social Impacts of the
Cannabis Expiation Notice Scheme in SouthAustralia. Canberra : Department
of Health and Aged Care. (Available onlineat:http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/publicat/drugs.htm) Allain, J. 1997.Bill
C-8 :The Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act.Ottawa : Library of Parliament– Parliamentary Research
Branch. Allan, Travis.2001.
« Drug Laws: the debatenobody wants ».The Guardian.May 14. AnslingerH.J.
and W. Oursler. « The War against the Murderers ». in WalkerIII, W.O.
(ed.). 1996.Drugs in theWestern
Hemisphere: An Odyssey ofCultures in Conflict. Wilmington (Delaware) :
Scholarly Resources Inc. AnthonyJ.C.
and J.E. Helzer. 1991. « Syndromes of Drug Abuse and Dependence ».in
Robins, L.N. and D.A. Regier (eds.). 1991.PsychiatricDisorders
in America. New York. Free Press : 116-154 Anthony,J.C.
et. al. 1994. « Comparative Epidemiology of Dependence on Tobacco,Alcohol,
Controlled Substances and Inhalants : Basic Findings from theNational
Comorbidity Survey ».Experimentaland
Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2 : 244-268. Aquatias.S.
et. al. 1997. L’usage dur des
droguesdouces, recherche sur la consommation de cannabis dans la banlieue parisienne.Paris :
OFDT. Aquatias,S. 1999. « Usages du cannabis et situations sociales: Réflexion sur les conditions sociales des différentes consommationspossibles de cannabis. » inFaugeron, C. (ed.). 1999.Les drogues enFrance. Paris : Georg. Ashton, C.H. 2001.
« Pharmacology and Effects ofCannabis: A brief review. » BritishJournal of Psychiatry.178 :
101-106. Ati-Dion, G. 1999.The
Structure of Drug Prohibitionin International Law and in Canadian Law.Montreal : University of Montreal
- School of Criminology. Bala,N.
and al. (dir.). 2002.Juvenile
JusticeSystems: An InternationalComparison of Problems and Solutions.
Toronto :Thompson Educational Publishing. Barré, M.D.,Pottier, M.L.
et S. Delaître. 2001.Toxicomanie,police,
justice : trajectoires pénales. Paris : OFDT. Beardsley,R.M
et. al. 1986. « Dependence on THC in rhesus monkeys ».Journal
ofPharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.Exp. Ther.239(2) : 311-319. Beauchesne,Line. 1991.La légalisation desdrogues… Pour mieux en prévenir
les abus. Montreal : Méridien. Beauchesne,Line. 1999.
« À propos du cannabis, que faire? ». L’écho-toxico.Fall 1999.9(2). Belenko,Steven
R. (dir.). 2000.Drugs and DrugPolicy in
America: A DocumentaryHistory. Westport (Connecticut) : Greenwood Press.
Beltrame,Julian. 2001.
« Reefer Madness : The Sequel. » MacLean’s. 114(32): 22-25. Bergeron,
H. 1996.Soignerla toxicomanie. Les
dispositifs desoins entre idéologie et action. Paris :L’Harmattan. Bergeron,
H. 1998. « Comment soigner lestoxicomanes? »,Sociétal,June-July 1998 : 45-49. Bernat
de Celis, J. 1996.Drogues :
Consommation interdite. Paris : L’Harmattan. Bewley-Taylor,
D.R. 1999.The United States and
International Drug Control.Londonet
New York : Printer. Bigelow,G.E. 1985.Identifying Types of DrugIntoxication: Laboratory Evaluation of a
Subject-Examination Procedure.Quoted in Sandler, D. 2000. « Expert and
Opinion Testimony of LawEnforcement Officers Regarding Identification of Drug
Impaired Drivers. ». University of
Hawaii Law Review23(1) : 150-181. Bisiou,Y., (1999) « Histoire des politiques
criminelles : Le cas des régies françaises des stupéfiants. » in
Faugeron, C., (ed.). 1999.Lesdrogues en
France. Politiques,marchés, usages. Paris :Georg. Boekhoutvan
Solinge, T. 1997The Swedish DrugControl
System : An in-depth Review and Analysis. Amsterdam : Centrefor Drug
Research – University of Amsterdam. Boekhoutvan
Solinge, T. 1998. « La Politique de drogue aux Pays-Bas: un essai
dechangement ».Déviance et Société.
22 : 69 à 71. Boggio,Y. et. al. 1997.Apprendre à gérer : La politique suisse en matière de drogue.
Genève : Georg. Boyd, N. 1991.Highsociety : Illegal and Legal Drugs
in Canada.Toronto : Key PorterBooks. Brereton,D.
2000. « The History and Politics of Prohibition ». inStokes, G.,
Chalk, P. and K. Gillen. 2000.Drugs and Democracy: In search ofnew
directions.Carlton South: Melbourne University Press. BritishColumbia Compassion Club Society.2001. BCCCSResponse to
Health Canada’s Proposed Medical Marijuana Access Regulations.Vancouver. May 4, 2001. Brucker,Theresa.
2002.The Practical Guide to the
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.Scarborough:
Carswell (Fourth Edition). Bruun,Kettil,
Pan, L. and I. Rexed. 1975.TheGentlemen’s
Club: International Control of Drugs and Alcohol. Chicago :University
of Chicago Press. Caballero,
F. andY. Bisiou (2000)Droit de la drogue.
Paris : Dalloz (Second Edition). Campbell,I. 1976. “ The Amotivational Syndrome and
Cannabis Use with Emphasis on theCanadian Scene ”.Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences. 282 :33-36. Campodònico,H.
1996. « Drug Trafficking, Money and Neo-liberal Economics :Perverse
Effects for a Developing Country. » in Dorn, N. et.alii.(eds.). 1996.European Drug Policies and Enforcement.
London : Macmillan Press. Canada. 1970.Interim
Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Non-Medical Use of Drugs.(Le Dain
Commission) Ottawa : Information Canada. Canada.1972.Cannabis : A Report of the Commission
of Inquiry into Non-MedicalUse of Drugs.(Le Dain Commission) Ottawa :
Information Canada. Canada.1973.Final Report of the Commission of Inquiry
into Non-Medical Use ofDrugs.(Le Dain Commission) Ottawa : Information
Canada. Canada.1987.Federal Government Launches Co-ordinated
Action on Drug Abuse. NewsRelease. Canada.1987.National Drug Strategy: Prevention,
Treatment, Research, ControlComponents. Ottawa : Department of Health and Welfare. Canada.1987.National Drug Strategy:International Components. Ottawa :
Department of Health and Welfare. Canada.1987.National Drug Strategy: Enforcement
Components. Ottawa : Departmentof Health and Welfare. Canada.1987.National Drug Strategy: Proceeds of Crime
Components. Ottawa :Department of Health and Welfare. Canada.1988.Action on Drug Abuse: Making a Difference. Ottawa : Department of
Supply and Services. Canada.1991.Canada’s Drug Strategy.
Canada.1992.Canada’s Drug Strategy – Phase II. Canada.1994.Canada’s Drug Strategy – Phase II:
A situation paper.Ottawa: Health Canada CanadianCenter
on Substance Abuse. 1999.CanadianProfile:
Alcohol, Tobacco and other Drugs.Ottawa : CCSA. CanadianMedical
Protective Association. 2001.WhatTo Do
When Your Patients Apply For A Licence To Possess Marijuana For MedicalPurposes.
October 2001. CanadianMedical
Protective Association. 2001.Letterto the
Honourable Allan Rock, Q.C.,
November 2001. CanadianPolice
Association (CPA).2001.Briefsubmitted
to the Senate of Canada Special Committee on Illegal Drugs.Ottawa : CPA. Caplan,G.A.
and B.A. Brigham. 1990. « Marijuana smoking and carcinoma of thetongue: Is
there an association? ». Cancer. 66 :
1005-1006. Carrier,N.
2000.Discours de patrouilleurs
montréalais sur la détection del’infraction de possession de drogues prohibées.
Montreal : School ofCriminology – University of Montreal Centrecanadien
de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies. 1996.Lapolitique antidrogue au Canada. Mémoire au Comité
permanent de la Santé de la Chambre des communes. Ottawa : CCLAT. Centre d’aideet d’accueil
en toxicomanie(CAAT),La mise en application de la loi. (Available online at: http://caat.multimania.com/info/app_loi.htm.) Cesoni,L.L.
.1999.Usage et actes préparatoires de l’usage des drogues
illicites :les choix en matière d’incrimination – Analyse comparative de l’usage de drogues illicites de sept législationseuropéennes. in Conseil fédéral suisse.2001.Message concernant la révision de la loisur les stupéfiants. Changeux, J.P.and P.
Ricoeur. 1998.Ce qui nous faitpenser. La
nature et la règle. Paris : Odile Jacob. Channabasavanna,M,
et. al. 1999. « Mental and behavioural disorders due to cannabis
use ».in Kalant H. et. al. (eds.). 1999.TheHealth Effects of Cannabis, Toronto : CAMH. Charras,I.
1998. « L’État et les stupéfiants : archéologie d’unepolitique
publique répressive. » inDrogue.Du
bon usage des politiques publiques. Les cahiers dela sécurité intérieure. (32). Chatterjee,S.K.
1988.A Guide to theInternational Drugs
Conventions. London : Commonwealth Secretariat Chevalier,S.
and O. Lemoine. 2000. « Consommation de drogues et autres
substancespsychoactives » inEnquêtesociale
et de santé 1998. Québec : Institut de la statistique du Québec Cienski,Jan
and C. Hanlon. 2002. “U.S. fears drug spillover from Canada: Borderseizures up
dramatically in wake of Sept. 11.”NationalPost.
17 mai : A 12. Clark,P.A.. 2000. « The Ethics of
Medical Marijuana : governmentrestrictions vs. medical necessity. ».Journalof Public Health Policy.
21 : 40-60. Cohen,P.D.A.
and H.L. Kaal.2001.The Irrelevance of Drug Policy: Patterns and
careers of experiencedcannabis use in the population of Amsterdam, San
Francisco and Bremen. Amsterdam : University of Amsterdam (CEDRO). Collin,C.
2001.National Drug Policy: France.
Ottawa : Library of Parliament – ParliamentaryResearch Branch. (Available
online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Collin, C. 2002.NationalDrug Policy: Switzerland.Ottawa :Library
of Parliament – Parliamentary Research Branch. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Comité consultatifnational d’éthique. 1994.Rapports surles toxicomanies. Report no 43.
23 November 1994 :19. (Available online at:http://www.ccne-ethique.org/français/start.htm) Comitépermanent
de lutte à la toxicomanie. 1999.Avissur
la déjudiciarisation de la possession simple de cannabis. Montreal :
CPLT. Comitépermanent
de lutte à la toxicomanie. 2000. Consultation
2000. Latoxicomanie au Québec : Cap sur une stratégie nationale.
Quebec City :CPLT. Comitépermanent
de lutte à la toxicomanie. 2001.Drogues.
Savoir plus. RisquerMoins.Montreal : Stanké. (Quebec’s Edition) Commission
fédérale pour les questions liées auxdrogues.1999.Rapport sur le cannabis. Berne :
Office fédéral de la santépublique. Compton, P.R. 1986. Field Evaluation of the LosAngeles Police
Department Drugs Detection Procedure. Quoted in Sandler, D. 2000.
« Expert and Opinion Testimony of LawEnforcement Officers Regarding
Identification of Drug Impaired Drivers. ». University of Hawaii Law Review23(1) : 150-181. Conseil fédéral suisse. 2001.Messageconcernant la révision de la loi sur les stupéfiants. Convention against Illicit Traffic in
NarcoticDrugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988 (CTS 1990/42). Convention
on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 (CTS1988/35). CorrectionalService Canada. 2001. « Profiling the
drug offender population in Canadianfederal corrections ».Forum onCorrections Research. 13 (3) : 25-29. Currie,D.P.
2000.The Constitution of the United
States: A Primer for the People. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Curtis, C.K. 1999.TheEfficacy of the Drug Abuse Resistance
Education Program (DARE) in West VancouverSchools. Part 1 – Attitudestoward
DARE : An examination of opinions, preferences, and perceptions
ofstudents, teachers, and parents.GRC West Vancouver. DeKoninck,
Thomas. 2002.The Role of Knowledge and Culture in Public Policy onIllegal
Drugs.Quebec City: Laval
University – Professor of Philosophy. (Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) DeKort,
M. 1994. « A Short History of Drugs in the Netherlands. » in Leuw, E.
and I. Haen Marshall (eds.). 1994.BetweenProhibition
and Legalization. TheDutch experiment in drug policy.
Amsterdam :Kugler. Declarationof
the International Conference on Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking
andComprehensive Multidisciplinary Outline of Future Activities in Drug
AbuseControl, Document of United Nations, ST/NAR/14, 1988. Department ofHealth and
Social Affairs. 2002.NationalAction Plan
on Narcotic Drugs, Briefing Note. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1990.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1989.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice of United States of America. 1991.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1990.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1992.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1991.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1992.Jail
Inmates 1990.Washington(D.C.):Bureau
of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1993.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1992.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1994.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1993.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1995.Jail
and Jail Inmates 1993-1994.Washington(D.C.):Bureau
of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States – America. 1995.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1994.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1996.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1995.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1998.Prisonersin
1997.Washington (D.C.):Bureau
of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 1999.Prisonersin
1998.Washington (D.C.):Bureau
of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 2000.Prisonersin
1999.Washington (D.C.):Bureau
of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Departmentof
Justice – United States of America. 2000.CorrectionalPopulation
in the United States Prisoners in 1997.Washington(D.C.):Bureau of JusticeStatistics Bulletin. Devane,W.A.
et. al. 1992. « Isolation and structure of a brain constituent thatbinds
to the cannabinoid receptor ».Science.258
(5090) : 1946-1949. Directionde
la Santé publique. 1997.Les
inégalitéssociales de la santé. Rapportannuel 1998 sur la santé de la
population. Montreal : Régie régionale de la santé et des services
sociaux deMontréal-Centre. Dolin, B. 2001.National Drug Policy: Netherlands. Ottawa :Library of
Parliament – Parliamentary Research Branch. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Dolin,B.
2002.National Drug Policy: UnitedStates of America. Ottawa :Library of Parliament – Parliamentary Research
Branch. (Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Donald, P.J. 1991.
« Marijuana and upperaerodigestive tract malignancy in young
patients ». in Nahas, G. and C.Latour (eds.). 1991.Physiopathology ofIllicit Drugs: Cannabis, Cocaine, Opiates. Oxford
: 39-54. Donald, P.J. 1991.
« Advanced malignancy in theyoung marijuana smoker ». in Friedman, H.
et. al., (eds.). 1991.Drugsof Abuse,
Immunity and Immunodeficiency. London. 33-36. Dorn, N. and A. Jamieson. 2001.
European Drug Laws : The Room
forManoeuvre. London :DrugScope. Doyle,C.
2000.Drug Offences: MaximumFines and
Terms of Imprisonment for Violation of the Federal ControlledSubstances Act and
Related Laws. Washington (D.C.) : Library of Congress –Congressional
Research Service. DrugScope. 2001.UnitedKingdom. Drug Situation 2000.Report
to the EMCDDA. London : Drugscope. Dubois, François. 2002.TheFederal Parliament and the Evolution of
Canadian Legislation on Illegal Drugs.Ottawa : Senate Special Committee on IllegalDrugs.
(Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Duke,Stephen
B. 1995. « Commentary: Drug Prohibition: An Unnatural Disaster ». 27Conn.L.
Rev. 571. DuPont,R.L.
1999. « Examining the Debate on the Use of Medical Marijuana. »Proceedings of the Association of
AmericanPhysicians.111(2) : 169. Dupras,Daniel.
1998.Canada’s International Obligations Under the LeadingInternational
Conventions on the Control of Narcotics. Ottawa : Library of
Parliament – Parliamentary Research Branch. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Editorial. 1997. « DecriminalizingDrugs ».Ottawa Citizen. April 12, 14, 15 and 16. Ehrenberg, A.1995L’individu incertain. Paris :
Calman Lévy. Ehrlich, S.2000.
« The Increasing Federalization of Crime ». 32Ariz.St.L.J.825. ElSohly,M.A.,
et. al. 2000 « Potency trends of delta9-THC and other cannabinoidsin
confiscated marijuana from 1980-1997. ». Journal of Forensic Sciences. 45(1) : 24-30. EMCDDA.2001.Decriminalization in Europe ? Recent
Developments in Legal Approaches to Drug Use. Lisbonne : EMCCDDA. Erickson,P.
and B. Fisher. 1995.Canadian
CannabisPolicy: The Impact of Criminalization, the Current Reality and Future
PoliceOptions. Bremen (Germany) : Paper presented at theInternationalSymposium
on Cannabis Policy, Criminal Law and Human Rights(October 5-7(1995)). EuropeanMonitoring
Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)FranceCountry
Profile: French Drug Legislation. European Legal Database on
Drugs.(Available online at:http://eldd.emcdda.org/databases/eldd_national_reviews.cfm?country=FR.) EuropeanMonitoring
Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction.CountryProfiles
– Sweden, European Legal Database on Drugs. EuropeanNGO
Council on Drugs and Development. 2001.ASnapshot
of European Drug Policies : Report on the state of drug policies in 12European
countries. ExecutiveOffice
of the President of United States.2001.Summary: FY 2002 National Drug Control
Budget. Washington (D.C.) : The WhiteHouse. Fant,R.V.
et. al. 1998. « Acute and residual effects of marijuana in humans. »Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior.
60 : 777-784. Fergusson,D.M.
and L.J. Horwood. 2000. « Cannabis use and dependence in a NewZealand
birth cohort. ».New ZealandMedical
Journal. 113 : 156-158. Fischer,B.
et. al. 1998. « Cannabisuse in Canada : policy options for
control ».PolicyOptions. 19 : 34-38. Fligiel,S.E.G.
et. al. 1988. « Pulmonary pathology in marijuana smokers ». in ChesherG. et.
al. (eds.). 1988.Marijuana:
AnInternational Research Report. (National Campaign Against Drug Abuse
–Monograph 7 : 43-48). Canberra : Australian Government PublishingService. Fligiel,S.E.G.
et. al. 1997. « Tracheo-bronchial histopathology in habitual smokers ofcocaine,
marijuana or tobacco ».Chest.112:
319-326. Focus on the Family.2002.Brief submitted to the Senate
Special Committee on Illegal Drugs.Richmond (British Columbia). Fontana,James
A. 1997.The Law of Search and Seizure in
Canada. Toronto : Butterworths(Fourth Edition). Fried,P.A.
1995. « Prenatal exposure to marijuana and tobacco during infancy,early
and middle childhood : Effects and attempts at a synthesis. ».Archivesof Toxicology. 17. Fried,P.A.
and B. Watkinson. 1999. « 36- and 48-month neurobehavioral follow-upof
children prenatally exposed to marijuana, cigarettes and alcohol ». Journal of Deviant Behavior andPediatrics.11 :
49-58. Friman,H.
Richard. 1996.NarcoDiplomacy:
Exportingthe U.S. War on Drugs, Ithaca (N.Y.) : Cornell University Press. Gaoni,Y
and R. Mechoulam. 1964. « Isolation, structure and partial synthesis ofan
active constituent of hashish. ».Journalof
the American Chemistry Society. 86 : 1646-1647. Gardner,D.
2000. « Why the war on drug has failed : Uncle Sam’s war ».Ottawa Citizen.September 5. Giffen,P.J.,
Endicott, S. and S. Lambert. 1991.Panicand
Indifference: The Politics of Canada’s Drug Laws, Ottawa: CanadianCentre on
Substance Abuse. Gilmore,W.
1990.Combating International Drugs
Trafficking: The 1988 United NationsConvention Against Illicit Traffic in
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances,London : Commonwealth
Secretariat Goetz, David. 2001.Drug
Prohibition and the Constitution.Ottawa : Library of Parliament –
Parliamentary Research Branch.(Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Goodrich,Leland M. 1960.
« New Trends in Narcotics Control ».International Conciliation.530. Grapendaal, M., Leuw,E., and H. Nelen. 1995.A World ofOpportunities: Life-Style
andEconomic Behaviour of Heroin Addicts in Amsterdam. New York :
S.U.N.Y.Press. Quoted in Boekhout van Solinge, T. 1999. « Dutch Drug
Policy in a European Context ».Journalof
Drug Issues. 29(3) : 511. (Availableonline
at:www.cedro-uva.org/lib/boekhout.dutch.html.) GreaterToronto
Area Combined Forces Special Unit. 2002.FactSheet
– Heroin. (Availableonline at:
www.cfseu.org/heroin.html) Greene, J. and V. Schiraldi.
2002.CuttingCorrectly : New Prison
Policies for Times of Fiscal Crisis.Washington(D.C.) : The Justice
Policy Institute. (Available online at:www.cjcj.org) Grinspoon, L. and J.B. Bakalar.
1997.Marijuana.The Forbidden Medicine.
NewHaven and London : Yale University Press. Gurley, R.J., Aronow, R. and M.
Katz. 1998. « Medicinalmarijuana : A comprehensive review. ».Journalof Psychoactive Drugs.30(2) : 139. Hall,W.
1987. « A simplified logic of causal inference ». Australianand New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 21 : 507-513. Hall, W. and N.Solowij. 1998. « Adverse effects of cannabis ».The Lancet. 352(9140) : 6 Hamel,D.
et. al. 2001.Perceptions de la population
québécoise en lien avec les programmes deprévention de la toxicomanie et du
VIH. Quebec City : Institut national de santé publique du Québec. Hanak,C.
et. al. 2002. « Cannabis, mental health and dependence. » in Pelc, I.
(ed.). 2002.InternationalScientifc
Conference on Cannabis. Brussels. Haney,M.
et. al. 1999. « Abstinence symptoms following smoked marijuana
inhumans »Psychopharmacology.
141 : 395-404. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
July 10, 1908. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
January 26, 1911. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
April 23, 1923. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
1932. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
February 24, 1938. Hansard,Senate, February
24, 1955. Hansard,Senate, June 23,
1955. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
May 30, 1961. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
June 7, 1961. Hansard, Houseof Commons,
March 27, 1969. Hansteen,R.W,
et. al. 1976. « Effects of cannabis and alcohol on automobile drivingand
psychomotor tracking ». Annals of
the New York Academy of Science. 282 : 240-256. Hartel, C.R. 1999.
« Therapeutic Uses of Cannabisand Cannabinoids. » inKalant, H. (ed.).
1999.The Health Effectsof Cannabis.
Toronto : Addiction Research Foundation. Hathaway, A. D. 1997.
« Marijuana and lifestyle :Exploring tolerable deviance. »Deviant Behavior : An Interdisciplinary
Journal. 18 : 213-232. Hathaway, A. D. 1997.
« Marijuana and tolerance :Revisiting Becker’s sources of
control. »Deviant Behavior : An
Interdisciplinary Journal. 18 : 103-124. Hathaway, A.D. 2001.Cannabis effects and dependency concerns in
long-term frequent users :a missing piece of the public health puzzle.
(Brief submitted to the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs.(Available
online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Hawkins,D.J.,
Arthur, M.W. and R.F. Catalano. 1995. « Preventing Substance
Abuse. ». in Tonry, M. and D.P. Farrington (eds.). 1995.Buildinga Safer Society : Strategic
Approaches to Crime Prevention.Chicago :University of Chicago Press. Healthand
Welfare Canada.1990.Straight facts
aboutdrugs&drug abuse.Ottawa :Department
of Supply and Services. Health Canada. 1996.Evaluation of Health Canada’s Contributions
to Canada’s DrugStrategy: Final Report. Ottawa : Canada. Health Canada. 1997.Evaluationof
Canada’s Drug Strategy: Final Report. Ottawa : Canada. Health Canada. 1999.ResearchPlan
for Marijuana for Medicinal Purposes : A Status Report. Ottawa: Canada. Health Canada. 2000.Minister Rock announces intention to develop
new approach for the use ofmarihuana for medical purposes. Ottawa. News
Release. September 14, 2000. Health Canada. 2001.Marijuana Medical Access Regulations -
Regulatory Impact AnalysisStatement. Ottawa : Canada. Health Canada. 2001.Marijuana Medical Access Regulations –
Amendments Resulting fromPublic Consultations. Ottawa : Canada. Health Canada. 2001.MedicalAccess
to Marijuana – How the Regulations Work.Ottawa : Canada. Henrion,R. 1995.Rapport de la Commission de réflexionsur la drogue et la toxicomanie.
(Rapportau ministère des Affaires sociales, de la Santé et de la Ville). Paris :La
Documentation française. Home Affairs Committee. 2001.Evidence to Home Affairs Committee Inquiry
into Drug Policy.London: House of Commons (United Kingdom). (Available
online at:http://www.drugscope.org.uk/druginfo/evidence-select/evidence.htm) House of Lords. 1998.Ninth
Report –Cannabis: The Scientific and
Medical Evidence.London :Select
Committee on Science and Technology. House of Lords. 2001.Second Report – TherapeuticUses of Cannabis.London : Select Committee on Science and Technology. Huestis,M.A.
et. al. 1992. « Characterization of the absorption phase of
marijuanasmoking. »Clinical
Pharmacology andTherapeutics. 52 : 31-41. Inciardi,James
A. 1986.The War on Drugs: Heroin,
Cocaine, Crime, and Public Policy. PaloAlto (California) : Mayfield
Publishing Company. Inglis,B.
(1975)The Forbidden Game: A Social
History of Drugs. Londres: Hodder and Stoughton INSERM. 2001.Cannabis :
Quels effets sur le comportement et la santé ? Paris : Les
Éditions Inserm. International Narcotics Control
Board. 1988.Reportof the International
Narcotics Control Board for 1987.Vienna : UnitedNations. International Narcotics Control
Board. 2002.Report of the International
Narcotics Control Board for 2001. Vienna : United Nations. Institute of Medicine. 1982.Marihuanaand Health.
Washington(D.C.) : National Academy of Sciences. Jackson, A.Y. 2002.The Costs
of Drug Abuse and DrugPolicy.
Ottawa : Library of Parliament – Parliamentary Research Branch.(Available
online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Jeffery,W.K.
et. al. 1996. « The involvement of drugs in driving in Canada :An
update to 1994. ». Can. Soc. Forens.
Sci. J.29 (2) : 93-98. Johnston, L.D. et. al. 2001.Monitoring the future. NationalSurvey
Results of Drug Use, 1975-2000. VolumeII College Students and Young Adults Ages
19-40. Bethseda (Michigan) : NIDA. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
2000.Drugs: dilemmas, choicesand the law.
York : Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (Available online
at:http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/foundations/N70.asp) Joy, J.E., Watson, S.J. and
J.A. Benson. 1999.Marijuanaand
Medicine : Assessing the Science Base. Washington (D.C.) :
Institute of Medicine. Kandel, D. and M. Davies. 1992.
« Progression toregular marijuana involvement: Phenomenology and risk
factors for near daily use ».in Glantz, M. and R. Pickens (eds.). 1992.Vulnerability to Drug Abuse. Washington
(D.C.) : AmericanPsychological Association. pp. 211-253. Kandel, D. et. al. 1997.
« Prevalence and demographic correlates of symptoms oflast year dependence
on alcohol, nicotine, marijuana and cocaine in the USpopulation ». Drugs, Alcohol and Dependency.44 :
11-29. Keh, D.I. 1996.DrugMoney in a Changing World.
EconomicReform and Criminal Finance. Vienne :UNDCP (Technical paper no4.). Keizer, Robert. 2001.The Netherland’s Drug Policy. Brief
submitted to the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs. Kilmer, B. 2002. « Do
cannabis possession lawsinfluence cannabis use ? ». inPelc, I.
(dir.). 2002.InternationalScientific
Conference on Cannabis. Bruxelles. King, A.J.C. et. al. 1999.Trendsin the health of Canadian youth. Ottawa : Health Canada. Kokoreff, Michel. 2001.Drug Policy in France: From Criminalization toRisk
Reduction. Brief submitted to theSenate Special Committee on
Illegal Drugs. Kopp, P. and C. Palle. 1999.
« Économistescherchent politique publique efficace. » in Faugeron,
C., (ed.). 1999.Lesdrogues en France.
Paris :Georg. Kopp,P.
and P. Fenoglio. 2000.Le coût socialdes
drogues licites (alcool et tabac) et illicites en France. Paris : OFDT. Kosten,T.R.
et. al. 1987. « Substance-use disorders in DSM-III-R. ».BritishJournal of Psychiatry.151 : 8-19. Kouri,E.M.
et. al. 2000. « Abstinence symptoms during withdrawal from
chronicmarijuana use ». Experimentaland
Clinical Psychopharmacology. 8 : 483-492. Krajewski,Krzysztof. 1999. « How flexible are the United Nations drug conventions? ».International Journal of Drug Policy. 10 : 329-338. Kušević,Vladimir. 1977. « Drug Abuse Control and International Treaties ».Journalof Drug Issues. 7(1) : 35-53. Labrousse, A. and A. Wallon.
1993.LaPlanète des drogues :
organisations criminelles, guerres et blanchiment.Paris : Seuil Labrousse, A. 1998.
« L’approvisionnement desmarchés des drogues dans l’espace Schengen. »
Les Cahiers de la SécuritéIntérieure.
32. Labrousse, A. 2000.Drogues.Un
marché de dupes. Paris :Éditions alternatives. Labrousse, A. and L. Romero.
2001.Rapportsur la situation du cannabis
dans le RIF marocain. Paris : OFDT. Lafrenière, G. 2001.National
Drug Policy: UnitedKingdom.Ottawa :
Library ofParliament – Parliamentary Research Branch. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Lafrenière, G. 2001.National
Drug Policy: Sweden.Ottawa : Library of Parliament – Parliamentary
Research Branch.(Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Lafrenière, G. 2001.Police
Powers and Drug-RelatedOffences. Ottawa : Library of Parliament –
Parliamentary ResearchBranch (Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp)
Landry,Michel.
2001.The Impact of Treatments Offered to Addicts in Quebec. Brief submitted to the Senate Special
Committee on Illegal Drugs. Leduc,D., Miller-Chenier, N. and S. Norris. 2001.Inventory of Federal Research onIllegal Drugs and Related Issues. Ottawa :Library of Parliament – Parliamentary Research Branch. (Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) LeducD.,
Miller Chenier, N. et S. Norris. 2002.Inventory of Provincial andTerritorial
Research on Illegal Drugs and Related Issues. Ottawa : Library of Parliament – Parliamentary
ResearchBranch. (Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Léger
Marketing. 2002.An Exploratory Study AmongCanadians About the Use
of Cannabis.Montreal : Léger Marketing. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Leiter, Richard A. (dir.). 1999.NationalSurvey of State Laws.Detroit : Gale Group. (Third Edition) Leland M. Goodrich. 1960. « NewTrends in Narcotics
Control »,International Conciliation,
no530 Letter
from Ms Kathy Bedard, Prince Rupert, BritishColumbia, May 15, 2002. Lipton, D.S. 1995.TheEffectiveness of Treatment for Drug
Abusers Under Criminal Justice Supervision. Washington (D.C.) :
National Institute of Justice. Lowes, P.D. 1966.TheGenesis
of International Narcotics Control. Genève : Droz. Luna, E.G. 1997. « OurVietnam: The Prohibition
Apocalypse »,Depaul L. Rev.46 :
483. MacCoun, R., Reuter, P. and T.
Schelling. 1996.« Assessing alternative drug control regimes. » Journal of Policy Analysis andManagement.
15 (3). MacDonald, Roederick A. 2002.The Governance of Human Agency.Montreal
: McGill University –Professor of Constitutional Law. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) MacFarlane,B.
A., Frater, R. J. and C. Proulx. 1996.DrugOffences
in Canada. Ontario : Canada Law Book. MacKay,
R. 2001.National Drug Policy: Australia. Ottawa : Library of Parliament – Parliamentary Research
Branch.(Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) MackenzieKing,
William L. 1908.The Need for
theSuppression of the Opium Traffic in Canada.Ottawa : House of
Commons(Sessional Paper 36b). MacPhee, D. 1999.
« Effects of marijuana on cell nuclei », in Kalant, H. et.al. (eds.).
1999.The Health Effects ofCannabis,
Toronto : AddictionResearch Foundation. MailletA.
and C. Cloutier-Vautour. 2002. Brief submitted to the Senate SpecialCommittee
on Illegal Drugs. Moncton. Malherbe, J.F. 2002.The
Contribution of Ethicsin Defining Guiding Principles for a Public Drug
Policy. Sherbrooke : University ofSherbrooke – Professor –Applied EthicChair. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Mangham, Colin. 2001.Implications
of a LiberalizedDrug Policy in Canada. Brief submitted to the Senate
Special Committee onIllegal Drugs. (Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Martineau,H.
and É. Gomart. 2000.Politiques et
expérimentationssur les drogues aux Pays-Bas. Rapportde synthèse???.
Paris : OFDT. Matsuda,L.A.
et. al. 1990. « Structure of a cannabinoid receptor and
functionalexpression of the cloned DNA ».Nature.346(6284) : 5561-564. McAllister,W.B.
1992. « Conflicts of Interest in the International Drug
ControlSystem », in William O. Walker III, (ed.). 1992.Drug Control Policy: Essays in Historical
and Comparative Perspective,University Park (Pennsylvanie) :
Pennsylvania State University Press. McAllister,W.B.
1999.Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth
Century : An international history.
London : Routledge. McCaffrey,B.R. 1999.Remarks before the First AnnualCriminal Justice and Substance Abuse
Conference.Albany (New York). June 29,1999. McDonald,D.
et. al.1994.Legislative Options
forCannabis Use in Australia. Commonwealth d’Australie. (Available online
at:http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/studies/aus/cannabis.htm) McKim, W.A. 2000.
« Cannabis ». in McKim, W.A. (ed.). 2000.Drugsand Behavior. An introduction tobehavioral pharmacology.
UpperSaddle River : Prentice Hall. McNamara,J.
D. 1999 « When Cops Become the Gangsters ».LosAngeles Times. September 21, 1999. (Available online
at:www.nakedgov.com/mcnamara.htm) McNamara, J.D.2000.
« Commentary : Criminalization of Drug Use ». Psychiatric Times.17(9). Mechoulam,R.
and Y. Gaoni. 1965. « A total synthesis ofdelta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol,
the active constituent of hashish. ».Journalof
the American Chemistry Society, 87 : 3273-3275. Meier,Kenneth
J. 1994.The Politics of Sin: Drugs,
Alcohol and Public Policy. Armonk (NewYork) : M.E. Sharpe. Mercer,W.G.
and W.K. Jeffery. 1995. « Alcohol, Drugs and Impairment in FatalTraffic
Accidents in British Columbia »Accid.Anal.
And Prev.27(3) : 335-343. Mewett,A.
W. and S. Nakatsuru. 2000.AnIntroduction
to the Criminal Process in Canada. Scarborough : Carswell(Fourth Edition). Miles,G.C.
et. al. 1974.An Experimental Study of the
Effects of Daily Cannabis Smoking onBehavioural Patterns. Toronto :
Addiction Research Foundation. Miller,M.
and G. Draper. 2001.Statistics on DrugUse
in Australia 2000. Canberra : Australian Institute of Health andWelfare.
(Available online at:http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/phe/sdua00/index.html) MinisterialCouncil
on Drug Strategy. 1998.NationalDrug
Strategic Framework 1998-99 to 2002-03: Building Partnerships. Canberra :
Report prepared for theMinisterialCouncil by a joint committee of the
Intergovernmental Committee on Drugs and the Australian National Council on
Drugs. (Availableonline
at: http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/nds/resources/publist.htm) MinisterialCouncil
on Drug Strategy. 2001.NationalAction
Plan on Illicit Drugs, 2001 to 2002-03. Canberra : Report preparedfor theNational
Expert Advisory Committee on Illegal Drugs. ( Available online
at:http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/nds/resources/publist.htm) Missioninterministérielle
de lutte contre la drogue et la toxicomanie (MILDT). 1999.Plantriennal de lutte contre la drogue et de prévention des
dépendances(1999-2001). (Available online at:http://www.drogues.gouv.fr/uk/what_you_need/whatyouneed_intro.html.) Missioninterministérielle
de lutte contre la drogue et la toxicomanie (MILDT). 1999.« Livret de
connaissances, Synthèse du plan gouvernemental de luttecontre la drogue et de
prévention des dépendances 1999-2000-2001 ».Drogues: savoir plus, risquer moins. MILDT (Available online
at:http://www.drogues.gouv.fr/fr/index.html.) Moreau deTours, J.1845.Du haschich ou de l’aliénation mentale, étude psychologique. Paris : Masson. Moskowitz, H.1985.
« Marihuana and Driving ».Accid.Anal.
Prev.17 (4) : 323-345. Munro,S.
et. al. 1993. « Molecular characterization of a peripheral receptor
forcannabinoids. ».Nature.
365 :61-65. Murphy, E.1920. « The
underground system. » Maclean’s.
15 mars 1920. Murphy, E.1922.The Black Candle. Toronto : Thomas
Allans. Musto,D.F.
1999.The American Disease: Origins of
Narcotic Control.Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press (ThirdEdition) National DrugMonitor.
2000.Fact Sheet: Cannabis Policy, Update
2000. Utrecht : Trimbos-Instituut. NationalDrug
Research Institute and Curtin University of Technology. 2000.TheRegulation of Cannabis Possession, Use
and Supply. Perth (Western Australia): Working Paper for theDrugs and
Crime Prevention Committee – Parliamentof Victoria. NationalInstitute of
Public Health. 2001.NationalReport :
Sweden 2001. Stockholm. Nelson, P.L. 1993. « A
critical review of theresearch literature concerning some biological and
psychological effects ofcannabis » in Advisory Committee on Illicit Drugs
(eds.) 1993.Cannabisand the law in
Queensland : A discussion paper. Brisbane : Criminal Justice
Commission of Queensland. Nolin,P.C.
1998.Foreword. in Riley, D. 1998.Drugsand
Drug Policy in Canada : A Brief Review and Commentary.Ottawa :Senate
of Canada. Noll,Alfons.
1977. « Drug abuse and penal provisions of the international drugcontrol
treaties ».Bulletin onNarcotics.
29(4) October/December 1977 : 41-57. Observatoirefrançais
des drogues et des toxicomanies (OFDT). 2000.Drogueset toxicomanies : Indicateurs et tendances. Issue of
1999. (Availableonline at:http://www.drogues.gouv.fr/fr/index.html.) Observatoirefrançais des drogues et des toxicomanies. 2002.Drogueset dépendances: Indicateurs ettendances 2002. Paris :OFDT. Observatoire
géopolitiquedes drogues. 1996.Atlas
mondial desdrogues. Paris : PUF. Observatoire
géopolitiquedes drogues. 1999.Rapport
annuel1998/1999. Paris : OGD. Officeof
the Auditor General of Canada. 2001.Reportof
the Auditor General of Canada – Chapter 11 – Illicit Drugs: The FederalGovernment's
Role.Ottawa : Department of Public Works and GovernmentServices. Office
fédéral de lapolice.Un aperçu de l’OFP.(Available
online at:http://www.bap.admin.ch/f/index.htm) Officefédéral
de la police. 1996.Exploitationdéfinitive
de la banque de données en matière de drogue DOSIS. 26 June1996. (Available
online at:http://www.bap.admin.ch/f/index.htm) Officefédéral
de la police. 2001.SituationSuisse :
Rapport de situation 2000Bern : Service d’analyse etde prévention.
(Available online at:http://www.bap.admin.ch/f/index.htm) Officefédéral
de la santé publique. 1998.Mesuresfédérales
pour réduire les problèmes de la drogue. Document de base del’Office
fédéral de la santé publique – Décision du Conseil fédéral du20 février 1991.
Doc. no3.4.1f. Officefédéral
de la santé publique. 1998.Programmede
mesures de santé publique de la Confédération en vue de réduire les problèmesde
drogue.(ProMeDro). 1998-2002. Officefédéral
de la santé publique. 2000.Lapolitique en
matière de drogue. September 2000. ( Available online
at:http://www.bag.admin.ch/sucht/f/index.htm) Officeof
National Drug Control Policy. 2001.NationalDrug
Control Budget Executive Summary, Fiscal Year 2002. Washington (D.C.):
The White House. Office ofNational Drug Control Policy. 2002.NationalDrug Control Strategy. Washington (D.C.) :
The White House. Officeof
National Drug Control Policy. 2002.NationalDrug
Control Strategy: 2001 AnnualReport. Washington (D.C.) : The White
House. Organisationmondiale
de la santé. 1952.Comitéd’experts des
drogues susceptibles d’engendrer la toxicomanie, Sériedes rapports
techniques, no57. Quoted in Caballero, F. et Y. Bisiou. 2000.Droit de ladrogue. Paris :
Dalloz(Second Edition). Organisationmondiale
de la santé. 1964.Comitéd’experts des
drogues engendrant la dépendance, Série de rapportstechniques, no273,
Quoted in Caballero, F. and Y. Bisiou. 2000.Droit
de ladrogue. Paris : Dalloz(Second Edition). Organisationmondiale
de la santé. 1969.Comitéd’experts de la
pharmacodépendance. Série de rapports techniques. no407. Quoted
in Caballero and Bisiou. 2000.Droitde la
drogue. Paris :Dalloz. Patten,D.,
et. al. 2000.Substance Use among High
School Students in Manitoba. Winnipeg : Addictions Foundation of
Manitoba. Patton,D.
et. al. 2001.Substance use among Manitoba
high school students. Winnipeg : Addictions Foundation of Manitoba.
(Available online at:www.afm.mb.ca) Pays-Bas. 1985.Groupe de travail interministériel surles
drogues et l’alcool. LaHaye : Ministère de la Justice. Peith,M.
2001.« Compatibilité de différents
modèles de dépénalisationpartielle du cannabis avec les conventions
internationales sur les stupéfiants. ». Avis juridique soumis à la
demande de l’Office fédéral de lasanté publique de la Confédération helvétique. Pelletier,M.
1978.Rapport de la mission d’étude sur
l’ensemble des problèmes de ladrogue. Paris : La Documentation
française. Pernanen,K.
et. al. 2002.Proportions of crimes
associated with alcohol and other drugs in Canada. Ottawa : Canadian
Center on Substance Abuse. Pires A.P. 2002.Lapolitique législative et les crimes à
« double face » : Élémentspour une théorie pluridimensionnelle
de la loi criminelle. Ottawa :University of Ottawa - Professor of
Criminology. ( Available online at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Plecas,D.,
Dandurand, Y., Chin, V. and T. Segger. 2002.MarihuanaGrowing
Operations in British Columbia – An Empirical Survey (1997-2000).Department
of Criminology and Criminal Justice – University College of theFraser Valley
and International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and CriminalJustice Policy. Polen,M.R.
1993. « Health care use by frequent marijuana smokers who do notsmoke
tobacco. ».Western Journal
ofMedicine. 158 : 596-601. PoliceFoundation.
2000.Drugs and the Law : Report of the
Independent Inquiry into the Misuse ofDrugs Act 1971. London : The Police
Foundation. Popper,K.
1978.Logique de la découverte
scientifique.Paris : Payot. Popper, K.1985.La connaissance objective.Bruxelles :
Complexe. Poulton,R.,
et. al. 2001. « Persistence and perceived consequences of cannabis useand
dependence among young adults : Implications for policy ».New Zealand Medical Journal. 114 :
13-16. ProgressiveConservative
Caucus Services, Briefing Note, June 1st, 1987. Ramaekers,J.G.
et. al. 2002. « Performance impairment and risk of motor vehiclecrashes
after cannabis use » in Pelc, I. (ed.). 2002.InternationalScientific Conference on Cannabis, Bruxelles. Real Women ofCanada. 2002.
Brief submitted to the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs.(Windsor,
Ontario) Rehm,J.
2001.The Costs of public policies to
fight illegal drugs. Brief submitted to the Senate Special Committee on
Illegal Drugs. Reinarman,C. and H. G. Levine (dir.). 1997.Crack inAmerica: Demon Drugs and Social Justice. Berkeley : University of CaliforniaPress. Reuband,K..
1995. « Drug use and drug policy in Western Europe. » European Addiction Research. 1 : 32-41. Reynaud,M.,
Parquet, P.J., et G. Lagrue (1999)Lespratiques
addictives. Usage, usagenocif et dépendance aux substances psychoactives.
Paris : Secrétariat d’État à la Santé et aux AffairesSociales. Rickard,M.
2001.Reforming the Old and Refining the
New: A Critical Overview of Australian Approaches to Cannabis.Canberra:
Department of the Parliamentary Library – Information and ResearchServices.
Research paper no6 2001-02. (Available online
at:http://www.aph.gov.au/library) Rigter,H.
and M. von Laar. 2002. « The Epidemiology of cannabis use. » inPelc,
I. (ed.). 2002.InternationalScientific
Conference on Cannabis. Bruxelles. Riley, D. 1996.Harm Reduction : Concepts andPractice. A Policy DiscussionPaper. Ottawa: Canadian Center on
Substance Abuse. Riley, D. 1998.Drugs and Drug Control Policy in
Canada : A Brief Review and Commentary. Ottawa : Senate of Canada Roberts,G.
and A. Ogborne. 1998.Profile: Substance
Abuse,Treatment and Rehabilitation in Canada. Ottawa : Health Canada. Robert,G.
and A, Ogborne. 1999.Best practices:
Substanceabuse, Treatment and Rehabilitation. Ottawa : Health Canada. Roberts,G.
et. al. 2001.Preventing substance use
problemsamong young people : A compendium of best practices. Ottawa : Health Canada. Robson,William. 2002. « How
many 'burbs must the drug war burn, before we call ita bust? » Ottawa Citizen, May 17, 2002.
Rodriguezde
Fonseca, F. et. al. 1994. « Down regulation of rat brain cannabinolbinding
sites after chronic delta-9-THC treatment ».Pharm.Biochem. Behav. 47 : 33-40. Roques, B.1999.La dangerosité des drogues.Paris :
Odile Jacob. Rosenthal,M.S.
and H.D. Kleber. 1999. « Making Sense of Medical Marijuana. » Proceedings of theAssociation of American
Physicians.111(2) : 159. Royal CanadianMounted
Police. 1999.Annual Report.Ottawa :
Canada. RoyalCanadian
Mounted Police. 2000.Drug Situation - Canada(1999). Ottawa : CriminalIntelligence Directorate – RCMP. RoyalCanadian Mounted Police. 2002.Drug
Situation - Canada(2001).
Ottawa : CriminalIntelligence Directorate – RCMP. RoyalCommission
of Inquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs South Australia. 1979.FinalReport.Adelaïde: SouthAustralian
Government. Russo,E.B.
2002. « The role of cannabis and cannabinoids in pain management. »
in Weiner, R.S. (ed.) 2002.PainManagement.
A Practical Guide forClinicians. Boca Raton, London,New York,
Washington : CRC Press. Russo,E.B.,
et. al. 2002. « Chronic cannabis use in the compassionateinvestigational
new drug program : An examination of benefits and adverseeffects of legal
clinical cannabis. »Journalof
Cannabis Therapeutics. 2(1) : 45. Rydell,C.
P. and S. S. Everingham. 1994.ControllingCocaine:
Supply vs. Demand Programs. RAND : Santa Monica (California).
Schiraldi,V.,
Holman, B. and P. Beatty. 2000.PoorPrescription:
The Costs of Imprisoning Drug Offenders in the United States. Washington,
D.C. : Justice Policy Institute. (Available online at:www.cjcj.org) Scholten,W.K.
2002. « Medicinal cannabis : A quick scan on the therapeutic useof
cannabis ». in Pelc, I., (ed.) 2002.InternationalScientific
Conference on Cannabis. Bruxelles. SenateStanding
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs. 1996.EleventhReport : Bill C-8 : The Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act.Ottawa :Senate of Canada. Setbon,M.
2000.L’injonction thérapeutique :
Évaluation du dispositif légal de prise en charge sanitaire des usagersde
drogues interpellés. Paris :Observatoire français des drogues et
des toxicomanies Sherman,L.W.
et. al. 1997.Preventing Crime :What
Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. (A Report to the United States
Congress). Washington (D.C.) : US Department of Justice. Simmat-Durand, L. 1999.
« Les obligations desoins en France. » in Faugeron, C., (ed.). 1999.Les drogues en France. Politiques,marchés,
usages. Paris :Georg. Simmat-Durand, L. 2000.La lutte contre la toxicomanie. Dela
législation à la réglementation.Paris : L’Harmattan. Single Convention on Narcotics Drugs, 1961, (CTS1964/30), amended by the Protocol amending the Single Convention on NarcoticsDrugs, 1961, (CTS 1976/48). Single, E., et. al. 1996.The Costs of Substance Abuse in Canada. Ottawa : Canadian Center on Drug Abuse. Single,E.
and T. Rohl. 1997.The National
DrugStrategy: Mapping the Future. Canberra : Report prepared by theMinisterial
Council on DrugStrategy. ( Available online
at:http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/publicat/document/mapping.pdf) Single,E.,
Christie P. and R. Ali. 2000. « The impact of cannabisdecriminalization in
Australia and the United States »Journalof
Public Health Policy. 21(2) : 157-186. (Available online at:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/senate/Com-f/ille-f/presentation-f/single-f.htm) Sinha, J. 2001.The History
and Development of theLeading International Drug Control Conventions.Ottawa : Library of Parliament –
Parliamentary ResearchBranch. ( Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Smiley, A. 1999.
« Marijuana : On-Road andDriving Simulator Studies » in Kalant,
H. et. al., (ed). 1999.TheHealth Effects
of Cannabis. Toronto :Addiction Research Foundation. Smith, D.E. 1998. « Review
of the AmericanMedical Association Council on Scientific Affairs Report on
Medical Marijuana. »Journal of
Psychoactive Drugs. 30 : 127-136. Spicer, L. 2002.Historical
and Cultural Uses ofCannabis and the Canadian “Marijuana Clash”.Ottawa : Library of
Parliament – ParliamentaryResearch Branch. ( Available online
at:www.parl.gc.ca/illegal-drugs.asp) Staatscourant. 1996. in Korf
D.J. and H. Riper.1999.« Windmills in their Minds? Drug Policy and Drug
Research in theNetherlands ».Journal
of DrugIssues29(3) : 451. Statistics Canada. 1997.
“Illicit Drugs and Crime inCanada”.Juristat.Canadian
Centrefor Justice Statistics. Catalogue no85-002-XIE. Statistics Canada. 1999.
“Justice Spending inCanada”,Juristat.Canadian
Centrefor Justice Statistics. Catalogue no85-002-XIE. Statistics Canada. 1999.
“Illicit Drugs and Crime inCanada”Juristat.
Canadian Centrefor Justice Statistics. Catalogue no85-002-XIE. Statistics Canada. 2002. “Crime
Statistics in Canada– 2001”Juristat.Canadian
Centrefor Justice Statistics. Catalogue no85-002-XIE. Stewart,David
P. 1990. « Internationalizing The War on Drugs: The UN ConventionAgainst
Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ».DenverJournal of International Law and Policy.
18(3) : 387-404. Stuart, D.1999. “The
Unfortunate Dilution of Section 8 Protection,” Queens Law Journal.25 (1). SubstanceAbuse
and Mental Health Services Administration. 2001.Summaryof findings from the 2000 national household survey on drug
abuse. Washington (D.C.) : Department of Health and Social Services. Swift,W.
et. al. 2001. « Cannabis use and dependence among Australian
adults :Results from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeeing
». Addiction. 96 : 737-748. SwissFederal Office of Public
Health.1999.The Swiss drug policy:
A fourfold approach with special consideration of the medicalprescription of
narcotics. Bern:SFOPH Sweden.2000.Summary of the report The Crossroads from the Swedish Commission ofNarcotic Drugs. Stockholm: The Swedish Commission on Narcotic Drugs Tashkin,D.P. et. al. 1997. « Heavy habitual marijuana smoking does not cause anaccelerated decline in FEV1 with age : A longitudinal study».AmericanJournal of Respiratory Critical Care. 155 : 141-148. Taylor, A.C. 1969.AmericanDiplomacy and the Narcotics Traffic,
1900-1939: A Study in InternationalHumanitarian Reform.Durham (N.C.): Duke
University Press Taylor, Charles. 1998.Lessources du moi : la formation de l’identité moderne. Montreal : Boréal. Taylor, F.M. 1988.
« Marijuana as a potentialrespiratory tract carcinogen: A retrospective
analysis of a community hospitalpopulation ».Southern MedicalJournal. 81 : 1213-1216. TheEconomist.2001.
« Stumbling in theDark ». 2001.The
Economist.July 28 – August 3. TheEconomist. 2001.
« The Untouchables ».Economist.
April 21, 2001. 359 (8218): 49 Trautmann, C. 1990.Lutte contre la toxicomanie et le trafic de stupéfiants. Rapport au premier ministre. Paris : La Documentation française. Tribunal fédéral.L’organisation judiciaire en Suisse.(
Available online at: http://www.bger.ch/index.cfm?language=french&area=Federal&theme=system&page=content&maskid=195) Trimbos-Instituut. 2000.The Netherlands Drug Situation 2000.
Report to the EMCDDA. Utrecht : TrimbostInstuut.(Available online
at:www.emcdda.org) United Nations .1976.Commentary on the United Nations Convention
Against Illicit Traffic inNarcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. Done
at Vienna on 20 December1988. New York : United Nations. UnitedNations
Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention. 1998.CountryDrug Profile : Sweden. 1998. Vienna : UNDCP. United Nations Office for Drug
Control and CrimePrevention. 2000.Demand
Reduction: A Glossary of Terms. Vienna :UNDCP. United Nations Office for Drug
Control and CrimePrevention. 2001.World
Drug Report 2001. Oxford : Oxford University Press. United States. 1972.International Narcotics Control: A Source
Book of Conventions,Protocols, and Multilateral Agreements, 1909-1971.
Washington (D.C.) :Bureau of Narcotics&Dangerous Drugs. Valois,Donat.
1972. « La marijuana et le haschisch ne seront pas légalisés ».Le Droit. Ottawa. 1eraoût1972. Van Laar, M.,et. al. 2001.Nationale Drug Monitor. Jaarbericht 2001.
Utrecht :NDM Bureau. Van Ree, Erik. 1999. « Drugsas a Human Right ».InternationalJournal of Drug Policy. 10
: 89-98 Vitaro, F., Gosselin C. and A.
Girard. 2002.Évolutionde la consommation d’alcool et de drogues chez les
jeunes au Québec de 1987à 1998 : constatations, comparaisons et pistes
d’explication. Montreal : Comité permanent de lutte à la toxicomanie. Wacquant, L.2000.Les prisons de la misère. Paris :
Éditions Raisons d’agir. WalkerIII,
William O. 1989.DrugControl in
the Americas. Albuquerque(Nouveau‑Mexique) : University of New Mexico
Press. WalkerIII,
William O. 1991.Opium and ForeignPolicy:
The Anglo-American Search for Order in Asia, 1912-1954.Chapel Hill(C. du
N.) : University of North Carolina Press. p. 16-17, Lowes (1966) :152-153. Wasmeier, M., et. al. 2000.Path analysis survey of substance use among
Newfoundland and LabradorAdolescents. Marijuana / Haschichand Solvent use.
St John’s :Memorial University of Newfoundland. Wayne,H.
and S. Wendy. 2000. « The THC content of cannabis in Australia :Evidence
and implications.”.Australianand New
Zealand Journal of Public Health. 24 : 503-508. Westlake,T.M.
et. al. 1996. « Chronic exposure to delta-9-THC fails to irreversiblyalter
brain cannabinoid receptors. ». Brain
Research. 544 : 145-149. Wheelock, Barbara B. 2002.Physiological andPsychological Effects of Cannabis:
Review of the Research Findings.Ottawa :
Senate Special Committee on IllegalDrugs. Wiesbeck,G.A.,
et. al. 1996. « An evaluation of the history of a marijuanawithdrawal
syndrome in a large population. » Addiction,
91(10) :1573-1579. Wisotsky,S.
1990.Beyond the War on Drugs: Overcominga
Failed Public Policy. Buffalo : Prometheus Books. Woody G.E. et. al. 1993.
« Severity ofdependence: Data from the DSM-IV field trials » Addiction.88 :1573-1579. WorldHealth
Organization. 1997.Cannabis: AHealth
Perspective and Research Agenda. Geneva : WHO. (Availableonline
at:www.who.org) ZimmerL.,
and J.P. Morgan. 2000.Marijuana myths,marijuana
facts : a review of the scientific evidence. New York : Lindesmith Center. II – Witnesses quoted in the report
Mohamed ben Amar, Professor, Pharmacology
andToxicology – University of Montreal, First Session, Thirty-seventh
Parliament,June 11, 2001, Issue no4.
Line Beauchesne, Professor, Department of
Criminology– University of Ottawa, Second Session, Thirty-sixth Parliament,
October 16, 2000, Issue no1.
Patricia Bégin, Director, Research and Evaluation
–National Crime Prevention Centre, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament,
June10, 2002, Issue no22.
Marie-Andrée Bertrand, Professor Emeritus
ofCriminology – University of Montreal, First Session,
Thirty-seventhParliament, April 23, 2001, Issue no1.
Hilary Black, Founder and Director – B.C. CompassionClub
Society, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, November 7, 2001, Issueno10.
Tim Boekhout van Solinge, Lecturerand Researcher in
Criminology–Utrecht University, First Session,Thirty-seventh Parliament,
November 7, 2001, Issue no. 11. Micheal J. Boyd, Chair of the Drug Abuse Committee
andDeputy Chief of the Toronto Police Service – Canadian Association of Chiefs
ofPolice, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, March 11, 2002, Issue no14.
Neil Boyd, Professor, Department of Criminology
–Simon Fraser University, Second Session, Thirty-sixth Parliament, October
16,2000, Issue no1.
Serge Brochu, Professor and Director of
theInternational Center for Comparative Criminology – University of Montreal,First
Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, December 10, 2001, Issue no12.
Bill Campbell, President – Canadian Society
onAddiction Medicine, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, March 11,
2002,Issue no14.
Mark Connolly, Director General, Contraband andIntelligence
Services Directorate, Customs Branch – Canada Customs and RevenueAgency First
Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, October 29, 2001, Issue no8.
John
Conroy, Barrister, First Session, Thirty-seventhParliament, March 11, 2002,
Issue no14. Jean-Michel
Coste, Director – French MonitoringCentre for Drugs and Drug Addictions, First
Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament,October 1st, 2001, Issue no7. Patricia Erickson, Researcher – Centre for
Addictionand Mental Health, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, May 14,
2001, Issueno2.
Julian Fantino,Chief –
Toronto Police Service, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament,September 10,
2001, Issue no5. Benedikt Fischer, Professor, Department of
PublicHealth Sciences – University of Toronto, First Session,
Thirty-seventhParliament, September 17, 2001, Issue no6.
David
Griffin, Canadian Police Association, FirstSession, Thirty-seventh Parliament,
May 28, 2001, Issue no3. Henry
Haddad, President – Canadian MedicalAssociation, First Session, Thirty-seventh
Parliament, March 11, 2002, Issue no14. Health
Canada, First Session, Thirty-seventhParliament, June 10, 2002, Issue no22. Kash Heed, Vice Drugs Section – Vancouver
PoliceService, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, November 7, 2001,
Issue no10
Gary E. Johnson, Governor, Stateof New Mexico, First
Session, Thirty-seventh, November 5, 2001, Issue no9. Cal
Johnston, Chief – Regina Police Service, FirstSession, Thirty-seventh
Parliament, May 13 2002, Issue no16. Harold Kalant, Professor Emeritus – University
ofToronto, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, June 11, 2001, Issue no4.
Perry Kendall, Health Officer –Province of British
Columbia, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament,September 17, 2001, Issue no6. Paul Kennedy, Senior Assistant Deputy
SolicitorGeneral, Policing and Security Branch – Solicitor General of Canada,
FirstSession, Thirty-seventh Parliament, June 10, 2002, Issue no22.
Barry
King, Former Chair of the Drug Abuse Committeeand Chief of the Brockville
Police Service – Canadian Association of Chiefs ofPolice, First Session,
Thirty-seventh Parliament, March 11, 2002, Issue no14. R.G. Lesser, Chief Superintendent – Royal
CanadianMounted Police, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, October 29,
2001,Issue no8.
Gillian Lynch, Director General, Drug Strategy
andControlled Substances Programme – Health Canada, First Session,
Thirty-seventhParliament, June 10, 2002, Issue no22.
Mary Lynch, Director, Canadian Consortium for
theInvestigation of Cannabinoids – Dalhousie University, First
Session,Thirty-seventh Parliament, June 11, 2001, Issue no4.
Nicole Maestracci, President – InterministerialMission
for the Fight against Drugs and Drug Addiction, First Session,Thirty-seventh
Parliament, October 1st, 2001, Issue no7.
Colin Mangham, Director – Prevention Source
B.C.,First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, September 17, 2001, Issue no6.
Céline Mercier, Associate Professor, Department
ofPsychiatry – McGill University, First Session, Thirty-seventh
Parliament,December 10, 2001, Issue no12.
Croft Michaelson, Director and Senior General
Counsel,Strategic Prosecution Policy Section – Justice Canada, First
Session,Thirty-seventh Parliament, June 10, 2002, Issue no22.
John P. Morgan, Professor of Pharmacology – City
ofNew York Medical School, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, June
11,2001, Issue no4.
Dann Michols, Assistant Deputy Minister,
HealthyEnvironments and Consumer Safety Branch – Health Canada, First
Session,Thirty-seventh Parliament, June 10, 2002, Issue no22.
Dale Orban,Canadian Police
Association, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, May 28,2001, Issue no3. Michel Perron, Executive Director – Canadian
Centreon Substance Abuse, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, June 10,
2002,Issue no22.
Senate of Canada, Proceedings ofthe Senate Special
Committee on Illegal Drugs, First Session, Thirty-seventhParliament, March-April
2001, Issue no1. Senate of Canada, Proceedings ofthe Senate Special
Committee on Illegal Drugs, First Session, Thirty-seventhParliament, May 28,
2001, Issue no3. Eric Single, Professor, Department of Public HealthSciences
– University of Toronto, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament,May 14, 2001,
Issue no2.
Diane Steber Büchli, Head, International Drug
AffairsUnit – Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, First Session,
Thirty-seventhParliament, February 24, 2002, Issue no13.
Art Steinman, Executive Director –
Alcohol-DrugEducation Service, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament,
November 7, 2002,Issue no10.
Ambros Uchtenhagen, Retired Professor – AddictionResearch
Institute, First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, February 4, 2002,Issue no13.
Mark Ware, Assistant Professor – McGill
University,First Session, Thirty-seventh Parliament, May 31st2002,
Issue no18.
Mark Zoccolillo, Professor, Department of Psychiatry–
McGill University, Second Session, Thirty-sixth Parliament, October 16,2000,
Issue no1.
|