|
The Black Candle
Judge Emily Murphy
A review by Nate Hendley
"When coming from under the influence of (marijuana), the
victims present the most horrible condition imaginable. They are
dispossessed of their natural and normal willpower, and their
mentality is that of idiots. If this drug is indulged to any great
extent, it ends in the untimely death of its addict."
Or so believes Judge Emily Murphy who wrote the forementioned
passage for her book, The Black Candle. Published in 1922,
Murphy's amazingly inaccurate account of drug addiction has the
power to amuse even today's most staunch prohibitionists through
its overblown rhetoric, biased sources and totally unqualified
claims. In fact, the book reads almost like a satire of a modern-day
anti-drug tract. Murphy's opus could be considered highly entertaining
reading, except for the fact that The Black Candle was
taken deadly seriously in its day and led directly to criminalization
of marijuana in Canada back in the '20s.
Emily Murphy was a Police Magistrate and Judge of the Juvenile
Court in Edmonton, Alberta when she decided to write the Black
Candle. Hopefully, she knew more about law than drugs because
her descriptions of substance abuse probably would have embarassed
the producers of Reefer Madness. She attributes symptoms
more akin to amphetamine use to pot smoking, thinks snorting cocaine
makes people invulnerable to pain, and feels the chief negative
side-effect of opium addiction is promiscuity.
Perhaps sensing that her own first-hand knowledge of drug use
was a little weak, Judge Murphy thoughtfully provided commentary
from qualified medical physicians. A certain "Dr. Warnock"
writing in the Journal of Mental Sciences for January,
1903, is quoted by Murphy as saying smoking hashish leads to "a
mild, short attack of excitement to a prolonged attack of furious
mania, ending in exhaustion or even death."
Besides the incredibly inaccurate medical descriptions of drug
use, The Black Candle also shows its age by revealing a
"drug abuse problem" so minute it is beffaling that
Murphy thought enough to write about it. In 1921, Murphy notes,
"fifty-four persons were convicted for using or peddling
(marijuana—or "Indian hemp" as she calls it) in Los
Angeles."
That said, the book also reveals a raw sense of racism that might
not have been out of place in the 1920's but seems viritrolic
by today's standards:
"Many Negroes are law-aiding and altogether estiminable,
but contrariwise, many are obstinately wicked persons, earning
their livelihood as freeranging pedlars (sic) of poisonous drugs."
Actually, compared to media descriptions of black crack gangs,
Murphy's comments about "Negro drug pedlars" doesn't
seem quite as dated as her Charlie-Chan like depictions of Oriental
opium users.
Orientals at first get off lightly, and Murphy is quick to point
out that "compared with the Hindu" or "Negroes"
for that matter, "The Chinese, as a rule, are a friendly
people and have a fine sense of humour." A few pages later,
Murphy lets her true feelings slip and describes Chinese people
as "black-haired beasts in our human jungle."
Towards the middle of her book, The Black Candle stops reading
like an anti-drug tract and begins to sound like a Ku Klux Klan
manual for protecting Anglo-Saxon supremacy. Indeed, it becomes
apparent that Murphy's chief concern about drug use is not the
threat of addiction or death, but the fear that "aliens of
colour" will "bring about the degeneration of the white
race" through traffick in various drugs.
Murphy makes completely unsustiantied claims about "hundreds
of (white) girls living with Chinamen" and black men who
"boast how ultimately they will control the white man."
The implication is obvious—drug use will weaken the will of
white girls, making them receptive to the rapacious advances of
Chinese men while drug use in general is part of a broader conspiracy
to allow non-white people to enslave Caucasians.
Taken from this perspective, The Black Candle can be viewed as
one long, racist argument for tighter immigration controls. Murphy's
position, certainly, is clear. "Aliens of colour" use
drugs and push them on white people. Therefore, the obvious solution
is to "insist on (people of colour's) exclusion from this
continent." To do otherwise, laments Murphy, "would
only be a demonstration of broken-headed ineptitude."
Broken-headed or not, marijuana was made illegal in Canada in
1923, one year after Murphy's totally misinformative but highly
influential book. Racist controls on immigrants were also imposed
in the 1920s, a reflection of Murphy—and other prejudiced Canadians'—belief
that multilcuturalism somehow spelled moral degeneracy and expanded
vice.
Like a watered down version of Mein Kampf, which was allegedly
about Germany's condition after World War One, The Black Candle,
allegedly about drug use, is one long racist screed against people
Murphy doesn't like.
To bad so many Canadians back in the '20s read it without cracking
a smile and viewed it is a serious piece of medical-political
literature, not as racist trash.
—Nate Hendley is a Toronto freelance writer.
His work has appeared in several alternative weeklies including
Montreal Hour, Ottawa X-Press, Detroit Metro Times and id magazine.
He has also been published in High Times magazine, Cannabis Canada
and The Addiction Research Foundation Journal.
|
Home
Basic Facts About the War on Drugs
Frequently Asked Questions
Charts and Graphs
Whats New
Entertainment
Mikes Favorite Motorcyle Rides
Choppers Page
Table of Contents
Web Log of Dr. Tom O'Connell
Feedback
Drug Abuse Treatment Resources
American Society for Action on Pain
Major Studies
1894 to 1970
Indian Hemp Drugs Commission - 1894
The Opium Problem - 1928
Panama Canal Zone Investigations - 1929
Wickersham Commission on Alcohol Prohibition - 1931
La Guardia Comittee - 1944
Drug Addiction, Crime or Disease? - 1961
Wootton Committee on Cannabis - 1968
Le Dain Commission - 1970
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition - 1970
1970 to Present
Licit and Illicit Drugs - 1972
Dealing With Drug Abuse - 1972
Marihuana - A Signal of Misunderstanding - 1972
Drug Use in America - Problem in Perspective - 1973
Cannabis Control Policy - 1979
The Facts About Drug Abuse - 1980
An Analysis of Marijuana Policy - 1982
DEA Ruling on Medical Marijuana - 1988
California Research Advisory Panel - 1989
A Wiser Course: Ending Drug Prohibition - 1994
Legislative Options for Cannabis - 1994
Consequences of Alcohol, Cannabis, Nicotine and Opiate Use - 1995
House of Lords, Medical Marijuana - 1998
Marijuana as Medicine - 1999
Drugs and the Law - 2000
Canadian Senate Special Committee - 2002
History
Reefer Madness Collection
Marijuana Medicines from History
Ancient History
General Histories
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
Licit and Illicit Drugs
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
The Drug Hang-Up, America's Fifty-Year Folly
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
The Narcotics Bureau and the Harrison Act
1800
1860
1870
1880
1890
Indian Hemp Drugs Commission - 1894
1900
Federal Court Decisions - 1900
1910
Federal Court Decisions - 1910
1920
Federal Court Decisions - 1920
Effects of Alcohol Prohibition
Senate Judiciary Hearings on Alcohol Prohibition
1930
Federal Court Decisions - 1930
Wickersham Commission on Alcohol Prohibition - 1931
Repealing National Prohibition
Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
The Demonization of Marijuana
1940
Federal Court Decisions - 1940
La Guardia Comittee - 1944
1950
Psychedelic Research from the 1950s and 1960s
Federal Court Decisions - 1950
MKULTRA - Government Research on LSD
The Traffic in Narcotics
1960
Federal Court Decisions - 1960
Drug Addiction, Crime or Disease? - 1961
Wootton Committee on Cannabis - 1968
Operation Intercept
1970
Federal Court Decisions - 1970
Le Dain Commission - 1970
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition - 1970
Licit and Illicit Drugs - 1972
Dealing With Drug Abuse - 1972
Marihuana - A Signal of Misunderstanding - 1972
Drug Use in America - Problem in Perspective - 1973
Cannabis Control Policy - 1979
1980
Federal Court Decisions - 1980
1990
Federal Court Decisions - 1990
Important People
Harry Anslinger
Dr. Hamilton Wright
Captain Richmond Pearson Hobson
Dr. James C. Munch
Legal
Federal Court Decisions - 1900
Federal Court Decisions - 1910
Federal Court Decisions - 1920
Federal Court Decisions - 1930
Federal Court Decisions - 1940
Federal Court Decisions - 1950
Federal Court Decisions - 1960
Federal Court Decisions - 1970
Federal Court Decisions - 1980
Federal Court Decisions - 1990
Federal Court Decisions - 2000
Oakland Cannabis Buyers Club
Treaties and Laws
Drugs
Marijuana
Cannabis Research Library
Medical Marijuana
Medical Marijuana Strain Guide
Complete Guide to Hashish
Marijuana History
Short History of the Marijuana Laws
Legal History of American Marijuana Prohibition
The Drug Hang-Up, America's Fifty-Year Folly
Marijuana, the First 12,000 Years
Marihuana Tax Act of 1937
The Demonization of Marijuana
Reefer Madness Comic Books
More Reefer Madness
General Information
Carl Olsen's Marijuana Archive
Alcohol
Opiates
Heroin FAQ
Methadone Today
Cocaine
Psychedelics
Books on Psychedelics
Psycotherapy and Psychedelics
Psychedelic Research from the 1950s and 1960s
Pyschedelics and Culture
Psychedelics and Social Policy
Psychedelics and Religious Experience
Psychedelics and Personal Growth
History of the Pyschedelic Rediscovery
Peyote Wisdom
Tobacco
Special Collections
Web Log of Dr. Tom O'Connell
Patrick Anderson
High In America, the story of NORML
Andrew Byrne
Andrew Booth Davies
Milton Friedman
Dr. Erich S. Goode
Douglas N. Husak
Rufus King
The Drug Hang-Up, America's Fifty-Year Folly
Drug Addiction, Crime or Disease? - 1961
John C. Lupien
Joseph McNamara
Dr. Tod Mikuriya
William Novak
Charles Tart
On Being Stoned
States of Consciousness
Miscellaneous
Government Publications
General Accountability Office
Drugs and Driving
Sentencing Project Reports
DARE
Kids and Drugs
American Society for Action on Pain
Drug Abuse Treatment Resources
Drug Reform Coordination Network
Drug War Chronicle
Marijuana Policy
DEA
Canada
Drug War Blogs
News Articles on Drugs
Debate
Basic Facts About the War on Drugs
Frequently Asked Questions
Charts and Graphs
Fiscal Analysis of Marijuana Decriminalization
A Response to the DEA web site
Information for Activists
Debate Manuals
The Opinion Page
The Drug Debate
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy