Schaffer Library of Drug Policy

Scope of drug use

Consumers Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs - Table of Contents
Nineteenth-century America a dope fiend's paradise
Opiates for pain relief - for tranquilization - and for pleasure
What kinds of people used opiates?
Effects of opium - morphine - and heroin on addicts
Some eminent narcotics addicts
Opium Smoking Is Outlawed
The Pure Food and Drugs Act
The Harrison Narcotic Act (1914)
Tightening up the Harrison Act
Why our narcotics laws have failed: (1) Heroin is an addicting drug
Why our narcotics laws have failed: (2) The economics of the black market
The heroin overdose mystery and other occupational hazards of heroin addiction
Supplying heroin legally to addicts
Enter methadone maintenance
How well does methadone maintenance work?
Methadone side effects
Why methadone maintenance works
Methadone maintenance spreads
The future of methadone maintenance
Heroin on the youth drug scene - and in Vietnam
Caffeine - Early History
Caffeine - Recent Findings
Tobacco
The case of Dr. Sigmund Freud
Nicotine as an addicting drug
Cigarettes - and the 1964 report of the Surgeon General's Advisory Committee
A program for the future
The barbiturates for sleep and for sedation
Alcohol and barbiturates: two ways of getting drunk
Popularizing the barbiturates as thrill pills
The nonbarbiturate sedatives and the minor tranquilizers
Should alcohol be prohibited?
Why alcohol should not be prohibited
Coca leaves
Cocaine
The amphetamines
Enter the speed freak
How speed was popularized
The Swedish Experience
Should the Amphetamines Be Prohibited?
Back to cocaine again
A slightly hopeful postscript
The historical antecedents of glue-sniffing
How To Launch a Nationwide Drug Menace
Early use of LSD-like drugs
LSD is discovered
LSD and psychotherapy
Hazards of LSD pyschotherapy
Early nontherapeutic use of LSD
How LSD was popularized - 1962-1969
How the hazards of LSD were augmented - 1962-1969
LSD today: The search for a rational perspective
Marijuana in the Old World
Marijuana in the New World
Marijuana and Alcohol Prohibition
Marijuana is outlawed
America Discovers Marijuana
Can marijuana replace alcohol?
The 1969 marijuana shortage and Operation Intercept
The Le Dain Commission Report
Scope of drug use
Prescription - over-the-counter - and black-market drugs
The Haight-Ashbury - its predecessors and its satellites
Why a youth drug scene?
First steps toward a solution: innovative approaches by indigenous institutions
Alternatives to the drug experience
Emergence from the drug scene
Learning from past mistakes: six caveats
Policy issues and recommendations
A Last Word
Notes
Permission to quote
Previous Page Next Page
Consumers Union Report on Licit and Illicit Drugs

PART IX

The Drug Scene

 

 

 

Chapter 61. Scope of drug use

We have now completed our drug-by-drug review of the psychoactive drugs in common use, especially those frequently used for recreational, nonmedicinal purposes. In this and the next two chapters, we shall present some data on the relative popularity of the drugs we have been describing; and we shall offer some comments on the vague and shifting line which separates "good" from "bad" drugs, prescription from nonprescription drugs, medicinal from nonmedicinal use. In subsequent chapters, we shall concentrate on the relatively small portion of the overall drug scene that is of the greatest current concern to most Americans–– the  youth drug scene.

By far the most popular mind-affecting drugs in the United States today are caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol. This is true on every significant measure: number of people who have ever used, number of regular users, number of daily users, number of man-hours spent under the influence of the drug, and money spent for the drug. * The amount of harm done to the human body by nicotine and alcohol, moreover, vastly exceeds the physical harm done by all of the other psychoactive drugs put together (see Parts III and IV). Further, the amount of damage done to the human mind by alcohol alone, as measured by mental hospital admissions, vastly exceeds the mental harm done by all of the other psychoactive drugs put together. Nor is caffeine necessarily a "harmless" drug (see Part II).

* In 1970, for example, Americans spent $15.7 billion for alcoholic beverages, $9 billion for tobacco, and $3.2 billion for the caffeine beverages, coffee, tea, and cocoa total of almost $28 billion. 1

These facts are commonly masked by the categorization of caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol as nondrugs. Society might equally well seek to solve its amphetamine, barbiturate, and marijuana problems by treating those substances as nondrugs; indeed, as discussed below, there is substantial reason to believe that the United States is moving in that direction. Whether or not such substances are legally defined as drugs however, they are all closely related components of our national drug problem.

Americans have long known that the current drug scene is vast; but its truly gargantuan dimensions came into clearer perspective as data began to emerge, late in 1971, from the computers of a long-term "Psychotropic Drug Study" funded by the National institute of Mental Health in cooperation with two academic research organizations–– the Social Research Group of George Washington University in Washington, D.C., and the Institute for Research in Social Behavior in Berkeley, California. In charge of the study are Dr. Mitchell B. Balter for the NIMH, Drs. Hugh J. Parry and Ira H. Cisin for the Social Research Group, and Drs. Dean 1. Manheimer and Glenn D. Mellinger for the Institute for Research in Social Behavior.

A part of the project, under the direction of Drs. Parry and Cisin, is seeking to determine the facts about psychoactive drug use in the population aged eighteen through seventy-four, excluding those hospitalized or in the armed forces–– based on a probability sample of 2,552 respondents interviewed during the fall of 1970 and spring of 1972. Some of the findings follow (some columns total more or less than 100 percent because of rounding).

Caffeine (coffee and tea). Some 82 percent of respondents in the Parry-Cisin study reported that they drank coffee and 52 percent that they drank tea during the previous year. 2

 

 Amount
  Users of Coffee
(Percentage)
   Users of Tea
(percentage)
 None
18
48
 Less than 1 cup daily
6
22
1 or 2 cups daily
30
21
3 or 4 cups daily
24
6
5 or 6 cups daily
12
2
7 or more cups daily
9
1

 

When use of the two caffeine beverages is considered in combination, it appears that very few Americans aged eighteen and over drink neither coffee nor tea, and that 25 percent drink six or more cups daily. 3

 

 Amount
  Users of Coffee and/or Tea
(Percentage)
 None
9
 One cup or less a day
7
Two cups
24
Three cups
21
Four cups
7
Five cups
8
Six cups
11
Seven cups or more
14

 

These figures are consistent with sales figures showing that enough coffee (excluding decaffeinated coffee) was sold in the United States in 1970 to provide every man, woman, and child over the age of ten with 2.4 cups per day–– or about 180  billion doses of caffeine a year.

The above figures, moreover, exclude hot chocolate and cocoa, caffeine containing soft drinks (mostly cola drinks), and over-the-counter preparations containing caffeine (such as  NoDoz).

Nicotine. Some of the Social Research Group findings for cigarette smoking have already been cited in Part III; they appear below in greater detail. 4

 

 Status
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Current smokers
43
34
Never smoked
25
51
Ex-smokers
32
15

 

The paucity of women ex-smokers in the table above is worthy of particular comment. Women smokers, however, smoke fewer cigarettes than men. 5

 

 Amount
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
1/2 pack per day or less
12
16
About 1 pack per day
19
15
About 1 1/2 packs or more
12
4

 

The number of cigarettes smoked in the United States in 1970, as noted earlier, totaled 542  billion. Thus, while there are far more coffee and tea drinkers in the United States than cigarette smokers, the number of  doses of nicotine consumed is almost certainly greater than the number of doses of caffeine.

 Alcohol. The Parry-Cisin study asked respondents whether they drank alcohol last year, whether their usual drink was wine, beer, or liquor, how often they drank during the year, and how much they drank. The replies were then grouped under six headings. 6

 

 Consumption
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Did not drink alcohol last year
22
37
Drank very infrequently
8
14
Light drinkers
13
17
Moderate drinkers
21
18
Heavy drinkers
24
11
Very heavy drinkers
10
3

 

Sales figures add some details. 7 Almost 18 gallons of beer were consumed during 1969 for every man, woman, and child in the United States. More than a gallon of wine was consumed. And distilled spirits consumption totaled 1.8 gallons per capita.

Beer, as might be expected, is the most popular drink among men; surprisingly, hard liquor is the most popular among women. When asked what alcoholic beverage they  usually consumed during the past year, respondents answered as follows. 8

 

 Choice of beverage
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Didn't drink last year
22
37
Mostly beer
41
14
Mostly wine
14
17
Mostly hard liquor
23
31

 

Psychoactive prescription drugs. Though these drugs show substantial use, the Parry-Cisin data suggest that they hardly compare in popularity with caffeine, nicotine, or alcohol. 9

First, respondents were asked whether they had used  any psychoactive prescription drug even once during the past year.

 

Answer
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Yes
13
29
No
87
71

 

The greater number of females using these drugs will be commented on below.

Among the users, a substantial proportion of the respondents used psychoactive prescription drugs only occasionally rather than daily. 10

 

 Frequency of use
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Occasionally
5
12
Daily
7
17

 

Among the occasional users, moreover, a substantial proportion used psychoactive prescription drugs ten times or less during the year. 11

 

 Frequency of use
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
10 times or less
2
5
11 to 30 times
1
4
31 or more times
2
3

 

Similarly among the daily users, quite a few used psychoactive prescription drugs daily for less than six months in the year. 12

 

 Duration of use
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Less than 1 month
1
4
1 month
1
2
2 to 5 months
1
3
6 months or more
4
7

 

When asked what  kinds of psychoactive prescription drugs they used during the past year, the user-respondents answered as follows. 13

 

 Type of drug
  Men
(Percentage)
  Women
(percentage)
Sedatives and minor
tranquilizers
8
20
Stimulants
2
8
Sleeping drugs (hypnotics)
3
4
Antidepressants
2
2

 

Thus it appears that the use of sedatives and minor tranquilizers by women (20 percent) is the dominant form of psychoactive prescription drug use in the United States.

Finally, the age distribution of users of psychoactive prescription drugs proved of considerable interest. Respondents who had used any psychoactive prescription drug at any time during the previous year were distributed as follows. 14

 

 Age group
Users
(percentage)
18 through 29
15
30 through 44
24
45 through 59
23
60 through 74
27

 

Frequency of use was also somewhat greater in the older age brackets. Thus 8 percent of those aged sixty through seventy-four reported taking a psychoactive prescription drug daily for six months or more during the previous year as compared with only 2 percent of those aged eighteen through twenty-nine. 15

The figures above, it must be stressed, apply only to psychoactive drugs  secured on prescription. When over-the-counter and black-market stimulants, depressants, and tranquilizers are added in (see below) a quite different picture emerges. Further, the figures above should be corrected to allow for underreporting by respondents. 16 This is a point to which we shall return.

Marijuana. This drug, as noted above, has been used at least once bv an estimated 12,000,000 to 20,000,000 Americans; annual consumption was estimated in 1970 at five million marijuana cigarettes a day, or 1.8 billion a year. The Parry-Cisin study, together with a study by Dr. Jack Ellinson of the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York City, covering young people under the age of eighteen, indicates that age is a major determining factor in marijuana use. 17

 

 Age group
  Ever used
marijuana
(percentage)
12 through 17
15
18 through 20
19
21 through 24
20
25 through 29
10
30 through 34
4
35 through 74
less than 1

 

Among respondents aged eighteen to twenty-nine the frequency of use was reported as follows. 18

 

 Frequency
 Percentage
Smoked marijuana 1 to 4 times
7
Smoked marijuana 5 to 49 times
4
Smoked marijuana 50 or more times
5

 

 Other illicit drugs. While the Parry-Cisin study did not cover other illicit drugs such as LSD, heroin, illicit barbiturates, illicit amphetamines, and so on, it is clear from data in earlier chapters (and in the following chapter)–– that the amounts of those drugs used is trivial compared with the amounts of caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, and marijuana used. One conclusion is thus inescapable: the United States has been focusing an overwhelming proportion of its anxiety and concern on a very small corner of the drug scene.

Another obvious inference to be drawn from the above estimates is that we Americans–– like almost all other human cultures, ancient and modern, primitive and civilized–– are a drug-using people. Indeed,  Homo sapiens is a drug-using species, and has been for thousands of years.

A third obvious inference is the relative rarity of non-drug-users in our culture. No estimate has been made of the number of American adults who have  never used a mind-affecting drug, including caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol–– but the number must be very small, a few percent of the population at most. The nonuse of mind-affecting drugs, indeed, can be described as aberrant behavior, deviating from the norms of American society.

Caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol were universally recognized as drugs during the nineteenth century, and were denounced as such. Their treatment as nondrugs today protects them from prohibitionist proposals and other repressive measures; it also enables coffee, tea, and alcohol drinkers, along with cigarette smokers, to decry the widespread use of "drugs."

  Footnotes Notes
Chapter 61

1. "Summary of 1970 Consumer Expenditures,"  Supermarketing, 26 (September, 1971): 39.

2. Data supplied by Social Research Group, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; Unpublished.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

6. Ibid.

7. The Liquor Handbook (New York: Gavin-Jobson Associates, 1970), p. 18.

8. Data supplied by Social Research Group, George Washington University.

9. Ibid.

10. Ibid.

11. Ibid.

12. Ibid.

13. Ibid.

14. Ibid.

15. Ibid.

16. Hugh J. Parry, Mitchell B. Balter, and Ira H. Cisin, "Primary Levels of Underreporting Psychotropic Drug Use,"  The Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (Winter, 1970-71): 582-592.

17. Data supplied by Social Research Group, George Washington University.

18. Ibid.

Previous Page Next Page