| 
      
       | Legal References on Drug
Policy DEA Affadavits on the
legal status of hemp seed - 1991 Federal Court Decisions on Drugs by Decade 1990 
  
    | Year | Title and Summary |  
    | 1990US Supreme Court
 | WASHINGTON, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. WALTER
    HARPER - No. 88-599 - 1990.SCT.1174 , 494 U.S. 210, 110 S. Ct. 1028, 108 L. Ed. 2d
    178, 58 U.S.L.W. 4249  - February 27, 1990 |  
    | 1990 US Supreme Court | ILLINOIS v. RODRIGUEZ -  June 21,
    1990 Respondent was arrested in his apartment and charged with possession of illegal
    drugs, which the police had observed in plain view and seized. The officers did not have
    an arrest or search warrant, but gained entry to the apartment with the assistance of Gail
    Fischer, who represented that the apartment was "ours" and that she had clothes
    and furniture there, unlocked the door with her key, and gave the officers permission to
    enter. The trial court granted respondent's motion to suppress the seized evidence,
    holding that at the time she consented to the entry Fischer did not have common authority
    because she had moved out of the apartment. The court also rejected the State's contention
    that, even if Fischer did not have common authority, there was no Fourth Amendment
    violation if the police reasonably believed at the time of their entry that she possessed
    the authority to consent. The Appellate Court of Illinois affirmed. Held: 1. The record demonstrates that the State has not satisfied its burden of proving that
    Fischer had "joint access or control for most purposes" over respondent's
    apartment, as is required under United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171, n. 7, to
    establish "common authority." Pp. 181-182. |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | CALIFORNIA v. HODARI D. - No. 89-1632 -
    1991.SCT.2395 , 499 U.S. 621, 111 S. Ct. 1547, 113 L. Ed. 2d 690, 59 U.S.L.W. 4335 - April
    23, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | FLORIDA, PETITIONER v. LUZ PIEDAD JIMENO ET
    AL. - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES -  No. 90-622 - 1991.SCT.2905 , 500 U.S.
    248, 111 S. Ct. 1801, 114 L. Ed. 2d 297, 59 U.S.L.W. 4471 -   May 23, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | CARLOS EDUARDO FERNANDEZ, PETITIONER v.
    UNITED STATES - No. 90-7210 - 1991.SCT.3002 , 500 U.S. 948, 111 S. Ct. 2249, 114 L. Ed. 2d
    490, 59 U.S.L.W. 3793 - May 28, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | RICHARD L. CHAPMAN, JOHN
    M. SCHOENECKER AND PATRICK BRUMM, PETITIONERS v. UNITED STATES - SUPREME COURT OF THE
    UNITED STATES - No. 90-5744 - 1991.SCT.3013 , 500 U.S. 453, 111 S. Ct. 1919, 114 L. Ed. 2d
    524, 59 U.S.L.W. 4530 - May 30, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | CALIFORNIA, PETITIONER v.  CHARLES STEVEN
    ACEVEDO - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - No. 89-1690 - 1991.SCT.3016 , 500 U.S.
    565, 111 S. Ct. 1982, 114 L. Ed. 2d 619, 59 U.S.L.W. 4559 - May 30, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | ARIZONA, PETITIONER v. CHRISTOPHER REED
    KEMPTON - No. 90-1379 - 1991.SCT.3307 , 501 U.S. 1212, 111 S. Ct. 2815, 115 L. Ed. 2d
    987, 59 U.S.L.W. 3822  - June 10, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | FLORIDA, PETITIONER v.  TERRANCE BOSTICK
    - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - No. 89-1717 - 1991.SCT.3475 , 501 U.S. 429, 111 S.
    Ct. 2382, 115 L. Ed. 2d 389, 59 U.S.L.W. 4708  -June 20, 1991 |  
    | 1991US Supreme Court
 | RONALD ALLEN HARMELIN, PETITIONER
    v. MICHIGAN - No. 89-7272 - 1991.SCT.3666 , 501 U.S. 957, 111 S. Ct. 2680, 115 L. Ed.
    2d 836, 59 U.S.L.W. 4839  - June 27, 1991 |  
    | 1992US Supreme Court
 | JAMES ARMIN FOWNER,
    PETITIONER V. UNITED STATES - No. 91-7169 - 1992.SCT.2959 , 112 S. Ct. 1998, 118 L.
    Ed. 2d 594, 60 U.S.L.W. 3778 - May 18, 1992 |  
    | 1992US Supreme Court
 | MARC GILBERT DOGGETT,
    PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES - No. 90-857 - 1992.SCT.3745 , 112 S. Ct. 2686, 120 L. Ed.
    2d 520, 60 U.S.L.W. 4741 - June 24, 1992 |  
    | 1992 Superior Court - Alaska   | STATE OF
      ALASKA,  Plaintiff, v. PATRICK A. MC NEIL, Defendant.    |  
    | 1993US Supreme Court
 | UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. SHARON DUNNIGAN
    - No. 91-1300 - 1993.SCT.1342 , 113 S. Ct. 1111, 122 L. Ed. 2d 445, 61 U.S.L.W. 4180 -
    February 23, 1993 |  
    | 1993US Supreme Court
 | JOHN ANGUS SMITH, PETITIONER v. UNITED
    STATES - No. 91-8674 - 1993.SCT.3276 , 113 S. Ct. 2050, 124 L. Ed. 2d 138, 61 U.S.L.W.
    4503 - June 1, 1993 |  
    | 1993US Supreme Court
 | MINNESOTA, PETITIONER v. TIMOTHY DICKERSON
    - No. 91-2019 - 1993.SCT.3408 , 113 S. Ct. 2130, 124 L. Ed. 2d 334, 61 U.S.L.W. 4544 -
    June 7, 1993 |  
    | 1993US Supreme Court
 | RICHARD LYLE AUSTIN, PETITIONER v.
    UNITED STATES - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 92-6073  0 1993.SCT.3942 ,
    113 S. Ct. 2801, 125 L. Ed. 2d 488, 61 U.S.L.W. 4811 - June 28, 1993 |  
    | 1993US Supreme Court
 | BENNIS v. MICHIGAN - SUPREME
    COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - Decided March 4, 1996 |  
    | 1993US Supreme Court
 | UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v.  ALVIN J.
    DIXON AND MICHAEL FOSTER - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - No. 91-1231 -
    1993.SCT.3944 , 113 S. Ct. 2849, 125 L. Ed. 2d 556, 61 U.S.L.W. 4835  - June 28, 1993 |  
    | 1994US Supreme Court
 | KEVIN ALBRIGHT, PETITIONER v.
      ROGER OLIVER, ETC., ET AL. - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - No. 92-833 -
    1994.SCT.680 , 114 S. Ct. 807, 127 L. Ed. 2d 114, 62 U.S.L.W. 4078 = January 24, 1994 |  
    | 1994US Supreme Court
 | UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. RALPH STUART
    GRANDERSON, JR. - No. 92-1662 - 1994.SCT.2019 , 114 S. Ct. 1259, 127 L. Ed. 2d 611, 62
    U.S.L.W. 4190 - March 22, 1994 |  
    | 1994US Supreme Court
 | FREDEL WILLIAMSON, PETITIONER  v. UNITED
    STATES - No. 93-5256 - 1994.SCT.4198 , 114 S. Ct. 2431, 129 L. Ed. 2d 476, 62 U.S.L.W.
    4639 - June 27, 1994 |  
    | 1995US Supreme Court
 | BAILEY v. UNITED STATES - SUPREME COURT OF
    THE UNITED STATES - No. 94-7448. Argued October 30, 1995 |  
    | 1996US Supreme Court
 | ANTHONY LEO STUTSON  
    v.  UNITED STATES - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES -  No. 94-8988. -  
    January 8, 1996 |  
    | 1996US Court of Appeals
 Fourth Circuit
 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v. EMMANUEL ODEMENA, Defendant-Appellant. - UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH
    CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EMMANUEL IKECHUKWU ANUDU, a/k/a Cletis,
    a/k/a Claytus, Defendant-Appellant.
 No. 92-5756 - February 16, 1996
 |  
    | 1996US Supreme Court
 | RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES -
    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - Syllabus - Certiorari to the United States Court of
    Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.- No. 94-8769. March 27, 1996 |  
    | 1996US Court of Appeals
 Fourth Circuit
 | UNITED STATES v. ARMSTRONG
    et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No. 95-157.
    Decided May 13, 1996 |  
    | 1998US Court of Appeals
 Fourth Circuit
 | Lynn V. West  - No. 96-1371  - UNITED
    STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT The main question in this case is whether
    a North Carolina tax on illegal drugs is in reality a criminal penalty. North Carolina's
    Controlled Substance Tax (Drug Tax), N.C. Gen. Stat.§§ 105-113.105 through 105-113.113,
    imposes a special excise tax on"dealers" who illegally possess a sufficient
    quantity of a "controlled substance," as that term is defined in the state
    criminal code. The statute requires drug dealers to submit a form reporting their illegal
    possession and to pay the tax. In return, dealers are supposed to receive stamps to affix
    to the drugs before they are resold. Payment of the Drug Tax does not make possession or
    resale legal, however. It should come as no surprise that no drug dealer has ever filed a
    form and voluntarily paid this tax. . . .  We further hold that the Drug Tax, like any other criminal penalty, cannot
    be enforced without the constitutional safeguards that accompany criminal proceedings. We
    therefore affirm the district court in part and reverse in part. |  |